Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359127›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Assessing Reproductive Performance to Establish Benchmarks for Small-Holder Beef Cattle Herds in South Africa.

Marble Nkadimeng, Este Van Marle-Köster, Nkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela, Fhulufhelo Vincent Ramukhithi, Masindi Lotus Mphaphathi, Johannes Matthias Rust, Mahlako Linah Makgahlela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marble NkadimengDepartment of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-0568
Este Van Marle-KösterDepartment of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Nkhanedzeni Baldwin NengovhelaDepartment of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Delpen Building, Corner Annie Botha and Union Street, Riviera, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2944-5789
Fhulufhelo Vincent RamukhithiAgricultural Research Council, Department of Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane 0062, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-5315
Masindi Lotus MphaphathiAgricultural Research Council, Department of Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane 0062, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-9593
Johannes Matthias RustDöhne Agricultural Development Institute, Stutterheim 4930, South Africa.
Mahlako Linah MakgahlelaAgricultural Research Council, Department of Germplasm Conservation and Reproductive Biotechnologies, Private Bag X2, Irene, Tshwane 0062, South Africa.

Funding

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research LS-2016-276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smallholder beef cattle farms in South Africa have had low reproductive performance, which has been associated with management practices. Considering current farm management practices, a multi-stage selection study was conducted to assess reproductive performance as defined by pregnancy rate, fetal and calf losses, calving interval and days open to benchmark reproductive performance. Data were collected twice, in autumn (March−May) for pregnancy diagnosis and in spring (September−November) for monitoring of confirmed pregnancies. Overall, 3694 cow records from 40 smallholder herds were collected during 2018 and 2019 breeding seasons from five provinces. The preferred 25th quartile described target performance and GLIMMIX procedure determined associations between management practices and performance. Smallholder farms on average recorded 50% pregnancy rate and 12% fetal and calf losses with 304 and 608 days open and calving interval, respectively. The derived target benchmarks for pregnancy rate, fetal and calf losses, days open and calving intervals in smallholder farms were 54%, 1.4%, 152 and 425 days, respectively. Reproductive performance was associated with no knowledge of body condition scoring before breeding, culling of old and non-productive cows, record keeping and low bull to cow ratio (p < 0.05). The performance benchmarks implied that industry averages may be improved if sustainable management services are provided through extension and advisory services.

Indexed as

cow fertilitymanagement factorsperformance benchmarkspregnancy rate

Identifiers

PMID36359127
PMCPMC9657001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.