Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36359015›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2022

In Silico Protein Folding Prediction of COVID-19 Mutations and Variants.

Sumana Bhowmick, Tim Jing, Wei Wang, Elena Y Zhang, Frank Zhang, Yanmin Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Using AlphaFold Predictions in Viral Research.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sumana BhowmickDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1201 Welch Road, MSLS, P259, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1481-047X
Tim JingDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1201 Welch Road, MSLS, P259, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-486X
Wei WangDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1201 Welch Road, MSLS, P259, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Elena Y ZhangDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1201 Welch Road, MSLS, P259, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Frank ZhangDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1201 Welch Road, MSLS, P259, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Yanmin YangDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1201 Welch Road, MSLS, P259, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4031-5165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With its fast-paced mutagenesis, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has threatened many societies worldwide. Strategies for predicting mutagenesis such as the computational prediction of SARS-CoV-2 structural diversity and its interaction with the human receptor will greatly benefit our understanding of the virus and help develop therapeutics against it. We aim to use protein structure prediction algorithms along with molecular docking to study the effects of various mutations in the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 and its key interactions with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor. The RBD structures of the naturally occurring variants of SARS-CoV-2 were generated from the WUHAN-Hu-1 using the trRosetta algorithm. Docking (HADDOCK) and binding analysis (PRODIGY) between the predicted RBD sequences and ACE-2 highlighted key interactions at the Receptor-Binding Motif (RBM). Further mutagenesis at conserved residues in the Original, Delta, and Omicron variants (P499S and T500R) demonstrated stronger binding and interactions with the ACE-2 receptor. The predicted T500R mutation underwent some preliminary tests in vitro for its binding and transmissibility in cells; the results correlate with the in-silico analysis. In summary, we suggest conserved residues P499 and T500 as potential mutation sites that could increase the binding affinity and yet do not exist in nature. This work demonstrates the use of the trRosetta algorithm to predict protein structure and future mutations at the RBM of SARS-CoV-2, followed by experimental testing for further efficacy verification. It is important to understand the protein structure and folding to help develop potential therapeutics.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansMolecular Docking SimulationMutationPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AProtein BindingProtein FoldingReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2AlphaFoldangiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptorHADDOCKreceptor-binding motifSARS-CoV-2trRosetta

Identifiers

PMID36359015
PMCPMC9688002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.