ArticleBiomolecules2022
In Silico Protein Folding Prediction of COVID-19 Mutations and Variants.
Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Insights into the Interaction Between a Core-Fucosylated Foodborne Hexasaccharide (HViruses · 2026Article
- Article
- A prediction of mutations in infectious viruses using artificial intelligence.Genomics & informatics · 2024Article
- Computational analysis of affinity dynamics between the variants of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (RBD) and human ACE-2 receptor.Virology journal · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 variant with the spike protein mutation F306L in the southern border provinces of Thailand.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 proteins structural studies using synchrotron radiation.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Protein Structure Prediction in Drug Discovery.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Using AlphaFold Predictions in Viral Research.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With its fast-paced mutagenesis, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has threatened many societies worldwide. Strategies for predicting mutagenesis such as the computational prediction of SARS-CoV-2 structural diversity and its interaction with the human receptor will greatly benefit our understanding of the virus and help develop therapeutics against it. We aim to use protein structure prediction algorithms along with molecular docking to study the effects of various mutations in the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 and its key interactions with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor. The RBD structures of the naturally occurring variants of SARS-CoV-2 were generated from the WUHAN-Hu-1 using the trRosetta algorithm. Docking (HADDOCK) and binding analysis (PRODIGY) between the predicted RBD sequences and ACE-2 highlighted key interactions at the Receptor-Binding Motif (RBM). Further mutagenesis at conserved residues in the Original, Delta, and Omicron variants (P499S and T500R) demonstrated stronger binding and interactions with the ACE-2 receptor. The predicted T500R mutation underwent some preliminary tests in vitro for its binding and transmissibility in cells; the results correlate with the in-silico analysis. In summary, we suggest conserved residues P499 and T500 as potential mutation sites that could increase the binding affinity and yet do not exist in nature. This work demonstrates the use of the trRosetta algorithm to predict protein structure and future mutations at the RBM of SARS-CoV-2, followed by experimental testing for further efficacy verification. It is important to understand the protein structure and folding to help develop potential therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.