ArticleBiomolecules2022
A Machine Learning Approach for Recommending Herbal Formulae with Enhanced Interpretability and Applicability.
Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the modernization of traditional Chinese medicine through artificial intelligence and multimodal data integration.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- A practical guide to implementing artificial intelligence in traditional East Asian medicine research.Integrative medicine research · 2024Article
- Advancing precision rheumatology: applications of machine learning for rheumatoid arthritis management.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herbal formulae (HFs) are representative interventions in Korean medicine (KM) for the prevention and treatment of various diseases. Here, we proposed a machine learning-based approach for HF recommendation with enhanced interpretability and applicability. A dataset consisting of clinical symptoms, Sasang constitution (SC) types, and prescribed HFs was derived from a multicenter study. Case studies published over 10 years were collected and curated by experts. Various classifiers, oversampling methods, and data imputation techniques were comprehensively considered. The local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) technique was applied to identify the clinical symptoms that led to the recommendation of specific HFs. We found that the cascaded deep forest (CDF) model with data imputation and oversampling yielded the best performance on the training set and holdout test set. Our model also achieved top-1 and top-3 accuracies of 0.35 and 0.89, respectively, on case study datasets in which clinical symptoms were only partially recorded. We performed an expert evaluation on the reliability of interpretation results using case studies and achieved a score close to normal. Taken together, our model will contribute to the modernization of KM and the identification of an HF selection process through the development of a practically useful HF recommendation model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.