Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358886›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

Elisa Agostinetto, Flavia Jacobs, Véronique Debien, Alex De Caluwé, Catalin-Florin Pop, Xavier Catteau, Philippe Aftimos, Evandro de Azambuja, Laurence Buisseret

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Real-world data on adjuvant capecitabine after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisa AgostinettoInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0295-7511
Flavia JacobsInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9126-8325
Véronique DebienInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Alex De CaluwéInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-7017
Catalin-Florin PopInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9791-4241
Xavier CatteauCurepath Laboratory (CHU Tivoli, CHIREC), Rue de Borfilet 12A, 6040 Jumet, Belgium.
Philippe AftimosInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Evandro de AzambujaInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9501-4509
Laurence BuisseretInstitut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.),1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-surgical treatments in patients with early breast cancer allows a direct estimation of treatment efficacy, by comparing the tumor and the treatment. Patients who achieve a pathological complete response at surgery have a better prognosis, with lower risk of disease recurrence and death. Hence, clinical research efforts have been focusing on high-risk patients with residual disease at surgery, who may be "salvaged" through additional treatments administered in the post-neoadjuvant setting. In the present review, we aim to illustrate the development and advantages of the post-neoadjuvant setting, and to discuss the available strategies for patients with early breast cancer, either approved or under investigation. This review was written after literature search on main scientific databases (e.g., PubMed) and conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 1 August 2022. T-DM1 and capecitabine are currently approved as post-neoadjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively, with residual disease at surgery. More recently, other treatment strategies have been approved for patients with high-risk early breast cancer, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib. Novel agents and treatment combinations are currently under investigation as promising post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies.

Indexed as

breast cancerpathological complete responsepost-neoadjuvant treatmentresidual disease

Identifiers

PMID36358886
PMCPMC9654353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.