Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358882›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Anastomotic Leak in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Massimiliano Fornasiero, Georgios Geropoulos, Konstantinos S Kechagias, Kyriakos Psarras, Konstantinos Katsikas Triantafyllidis, Panagiotis Giannos, Georgios Koimtzis, Nikoletta A Petrou, James Lucocq, Christos Kontovounisios and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Massimiliano FornasieroMedical School, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7793-2741
Georgios Geropoulos2nd Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos S KechagiasSociety of Meta-Research and Biomedical Innovation, London W12 0FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6681-8479
Kyriakos Psarras2nd Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos Katsikas TriantafyllidisSociety of Meta-Research and Biomedical Innovation, London W12 0FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-4473
Panagiotis GiannosSociety of Meta-Research and Biomedical Innovation, London W12 0FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1037-1983
Georgios KoimtzisPublic Medical Centre, Krya Vrysi, 58300 Giannitsa, Greece.
Nikoletta A PetrouDepartment of General Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-2451
James LucocqDepartment of Hepaticopancreaticobiliary Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-7818
Christos KontovounisiosDepartment of General Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Dimitrios GiannisDepartment of Surgery, North Shore University Hospital/Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnastomotic leaks (AL) following ovarian cytoreduction surgery could be detrimental, leading to significant delays in commencing adjuvant chemotherapy, prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors associated with anastomotic leaks after ovarian cytoreduction surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Scopus bibliographical databases were searched. Original clinical studies investigating risk factors for AL in ovarian cytoreduction surgery were included.

resultsEighteen studies with non-overlapping populations reporting on patients undergoing cytoreduction surgery for ovarian cancer (n = 4622, including 344 cases complicated by AL) were included in our analysis. Patients undergoing ovarian cytoreduction surgery complicated by AL had a significantly higher rate of 30-day mortality but no difference in 60-day mortality. Multiple bowel resections were associated with an increased risk of postoperative AL, while no association was observed with body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, age, smoking, operative approach (primary versus interval cytoreductive, stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses and formation of diverting stoma), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). DISCUSSION: Multiple bowel resections were the only clinical risk factor associated with increased risk for AL after bowel surgery in the ovarian cancer population. The increased 30-day mortality rate in patients undergoing ovarian cytoreduction complicated by AL highlights the need to minimize the number of bowel resections in this population. Further studies are required to clarify any association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and decreased AL rates.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakcytoreductive surgerymeta-analysisovarian cancersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36358882
PMCPMC9653973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.