Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358784›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Recurrence Score

Dominik Dannehl, Tobias Engler, Lea L Volmer, Annette Staebler, Anna K Fischer, Martin Weiss, Markus Hahn, Christina B Walter, Eva-Maria Grischke, Falko Fend and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik DannehlDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7653-8283
Tobias EnglerDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-2053
Lea L VolmerDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Annette StaeblerDepartment for Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Anna K FischerDepartment for Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5120-2065
Martin WeissDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-8339
Markus HahnDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Christina B WalterDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Eva-Maria GrischkeDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Falko FendDepartment for Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-293X
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Freiburg University, 79085 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-1542
Andreas D HartkopfDepartment for Womens' Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Exact Sciences (United States)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC) with a high risk of relapse often undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. However, only a few patients will gain benefit from chemotherapy. Since classical tumor characteristics (grade, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and Ki67) are of limited value to predict chemotherapy efficacy, multigene expression assays such as the Oncotype DX MATERIALS AND

methodsThe RS result was assessed in patients with HR+/HER2- unilateral eBC with 0-3 pathologic lymph nodes who underwent primary surgical treatment at the Department for Women's Health of Tuebingen University, Germany. Therapy recommendations without knowledge of the RS result were compared to therapy recommendations with awareness of the RS result.

resultsIn total, 245 patients underwent RS assessment. Without knowledge of the RS result, 92/245 patients (37.6%) would have been advised to receive chemotherapy. After RS assessment, 56/245 patients (22.9%) were advised to undergo chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was waived in 47/92 patients (51.1%) that were initially recommended to receive it. Chemotherapy was added in 11/153 patients (7.2%) that were recommended to not receive it initially. SUMMARY: Using the RS result to guide adjuvant treatment decisions in HR+/HER2- breast cancer led to a substantial reduction of chemotherapy. In view of the results achieved in prospective studies, the RS result is among other risk-factors suitable for the individualization of adjuvant systemic therapy.

Indexed as

breast cancerindividualized therapyoncotype DXrecurrence score

Identifiers

PMID36358784
PMCPMC9657368
OpenAlexW4308121578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.