Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358769›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

The Role of

Zihong Wu, Qiong Ma, Ying Guo, Fengming You

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  11. RETRACTED: The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  13. Influence ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Unraveling the Role ofCancers · 2025
    Review
  15. Impact ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  16. Potential Pathogens Associated with Colorectal Cancer.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  17. The oncobiome; what, so what, now what?Microbiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zihong WuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4879-8897
Qiong MaHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China.
Ying GuoHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China.
Fengming YouTCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Fengming You 82074315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer worldwide with poor prognosis. The presence of

Indexed as

colorectal cancerepithelial–mesenchymal transitionFusobacterium nucleatumproliferation and migrationtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36358769
PMCPMC9656216
OpenAlexW4307947491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.