ArticleCancers2022
Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Using Calcium Electroporation.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Endoscopic Assisted Calcium Electroporation in Esophageal Cancer - a Safety Study
Evaluation of Endoscopic Calcium Electroporation in Gastric Tumors: A Minimally Invasive Treatment Strategy
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishing a Salvage Endoscopic Electroporation (SEE) Service for Colorectal Cancer: The King's Protocol for Clinical Implementation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pioneering Endoscopic Calcium-Electroporation in Gastric Cancer: A Case Series of an Emerging Therapeutic Approach.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Palliative Luminal Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Using Endoscopic Calcium-Electroporation: First Case Series from United Kingdom.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- The Impact of Calcium Overload on Cellular Processes: Exploring Calcicoptosis and Its Therapeutic Potential in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- An Explorative Study on Calcium Electroporation for Low-risk Basal Cell Carcinoma.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant calcium electroporation for potentially curable colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Nanoenabled Intracellular Metal Ion Homeostasis Regulation for Tumor Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Calcium electroporation of esophageal cancer induces gene expression changes: a sub-study of a phase I clinical trial.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium electroporation (CaEP) is a novel cancer therapy wherein high intracellular calcium levels, facilitated by reversible electroporation, trigger tumor necrosis. This study aimed to establish safety with CaEP within esophageal cancer. Patients with non-curable esophageal cancer were included at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet in 2021 and 2022. In an outpatient setting, calcium gluconate was injected intratumorally followed by reversible electroporation applied with an endoscopic electrode. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of adverse events, followed by palliation of dysphagia. All patients were evaluated with CT and upper endoscopies up to two months after treatment. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04958044). Eight patients were treated. One serious adverse event (anemia, requiring a single blood transfusion) and three adverse events (mild retrosternal pain (two) and oral thrush (one)) were registered. Initially, six patients suffered from dysphagia: two reported dysphagia relief and four reported no change. From the imaging evaluation, one patient had a partial response, three patients had no response, and four patients had progression. Six months after treatment, the patient who responded well was still in good condition and without the need for further oncological treatment. CaEP was conducted in eight patients with only a few side effects. This study opens the way for larger studies evaluating tumor regression and symptom palliation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.