Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358702›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Using Calcium Electroporation.

Charlotte Egeland, Lene Baeksgaard, Julie Gehl, Ismail Gögenur, Michael Patrick Achiam

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04958044 phase1completednot on this map

Endoscopic Assisted Calcium Electroporation in Esophageal Cancer - a Safety Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMichael Patrick AchiamRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsEsophageal CancerArmsCalcium Gluconate
NCT07647731 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Endoscopic Calcium Electroporation in Gastric Tumors: A Minimally Invasive Treatment Strategy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital del Rio HortegaRan2026 to 2031Enrolled28ConditionsCalcium Electroporation for Hemostasis in Gastric NeoplasmsArmsEndoscopy Calcium Electroporation, Endoscopy Calcium electroporation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanoenabled Intracellular Metal Ion Homeostasis Regulation for Tumor Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte EgelandDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene BaeksgaardDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julie GehlDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-0210
Ismail GögenurDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Patrick AchiamDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

Rigshospitalet Forskningspulje xxxx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium electroporation (CaEP) is a novel cancer therapy wherein high intracellular calcium levels, facilitated by reversible electroporation, trigger tumor necrosis. This study aimed to establish safety with CaEP within esophageal cancer. Patients with non-curable esophageal cancer were included at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet in 2021 and 2022. In an outpatient setting, calcium gluconate was injected intratumorally followed by reversible electroporation applied with an endoscopic electrode. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of adverse events, followed by palliation of dysphagia. All patients were evaluated with CT and upper endoscopies up to two months after treatment. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04958044). Eight patients were treated. One serious adverse event (anemia, requiring a single blood transfusion) and three adverse events (mild retrosternal pain (two) and oral thrush (one)) were registered. Initially, six patients suffered from dysphagia: two reported dysphagia relief and four reported no change. From the imaging evaluation, one patient had a partial response, three patients had no response, and four patients had progression. Six months after treatment, the patient who responded well was still in good condition and without the need for further oncological treatment. CaEP was conducted in eight patients with only a few side effects. This study opens the way for larger studies evaluating tumor regression and symptom palliation.

Indexed as

calcium electroporationesophageal cancermalignant dysphagiapalliation

Identifiers

PMID36358702
PMCPMC9655404
OpenAlexW4307635097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.