Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358624›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Sia Pei Ling, Long Chiau Ming, Jagjit Singh Dhaliwal, Madhu Gupta, Chrismawan Ardianto, Khang Wen Goh, Zahid Hussain, Naeem Shafqat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Access to Supportive Care Among Australian Cancer Carers: Experiences of Priority Populations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sia Pei LingPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0001-7155-4922
Long Chiau MingPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0002-6971-1383
Jagjit Singh DhaliwalPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0002-3357-388X
Madhu GuptaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi 110017, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8503-0609
Chrismawan ArdiantoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3713-7900
Khang Wen GohFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-7019
Zahid HussainFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Naeem ShafqatPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-4082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tremendous progress has been made in cancer research over the years, and, as a result, immunotherapy has emerged as an important therapy for the treatment of cancer, either as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes and offers a viable strategy for not only enhancing the quality of life but also dramatically boosting the overall survival rate of cancer patients. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Databases such as PubMed and Science Direct were searched from their inception until September 2021, using the following keywords: cancer immunotherapy, cancer recurrence, cancer treatment options, and cancer therapies. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. There were a total of 599 articles; however, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final review ended up with 34 publications. In conclusion, the studies have demonstrated that immunotherapy is a viable alternative treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic cancer, since the overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate were shown to be successful.

Indexed as

antineoplastic agentbiological therapybreast cancercancer cellglioblastomaimmunomodulationmedicineneoplasmnon-small cell lung cancerpreventable death

Identifiers

PMID36358624
PMCPMC9655090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.