Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358442›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Environment Context Variability and Incidental Word Learning: A Virtual Reality Study.

Francisco Rocabado, Jorge González Alonso, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisco RocabadoCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28248 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4845-6950
Jorge González AlonsoCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28248 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-3226
Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28248 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-8559

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid H2019/HUM-5705Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities - Spain MPID2021-126884NB-I00UiT The Arctic University of Norway Publication Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that changes in the scenarios in which something is learned and recalled, respectively, may result in a subpar performance in memory recollection. The current study aimed to evaluate how changes in the visuo-perceptual environmental learning context impact incidental vocabulary learning. To this end, a highly immersive virtual reality setting was created, and participants were required to read eight distinct stories visually presented to them. A novel word was delivered twice in every paragraph and embedded in each story. Stories could be displayed either in a high variability condition, where each paragraph was shown in a new environment context (four different classrooms) or in a low variability condition, where each paragraph was shown in the same context. The findings obtained across four assessment tasks (free recall, recognition, picture matching, and sentence completion) demonstrated that significant visuo-perceptual variability did not bring about any disadvantages in word learning. Thus, perceptual information from a physically diverse environment could provide a variety of instructional and educational beneficial possibilities in the absence of a learning disadvantage.

Indexed as

context-dependent memorycontext variabilityincidental learningvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36358442
PMCPMC9688041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.