ArticleBrain sciences2022
Endoscopic Treatment of Rathke's Cleft Cysts: The Case for Simple Fenestration.
Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of sella floor reconstruction on Rathke Cleft Cyst recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pituitary · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of surgical management for Rathke's cleft cysts in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Surgical outcomes and predictors of recurrence following endoscopic endonasal marsupialization of Rathke's cleft cysts.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Transnasal Endoscopic Approach for the Revision of Rathke's Cyst and Successful Long-Term Follow-Up: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Cisternostomy in Subarachnoid Space for Symptomatic Rathke's Cleft Cyst.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Late meningitis and a nonabsorbable stent in recurrent Rathke's cleft cyst: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRathke's cleft cysts (RCC) arise from the pars intermedia because of incomplete regression of the embryologic Rathke pouch. A subset of RCC becomes symptomatic causing headaches, visual and endocrinological disturbances such that surgical intervention is indicated. Several points in surgical management remain controversial including operative strategy (simple fenestration (SF) vs complete cyst wall resection (CWR)) as well as reconstructive techniques.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of pathologically confirmed RCC operated on by endoscopic endonasal approach from 2006 to 2019. Pre-operative symptoms, imaging characteristics, operative strategy, symptom response, complications and recurrences were recorded.
resultsThirty-nine patients were identified. Thirty-three underwent SF and six underwent CWR. Worsening pituitary function was significantly increased with CWR (50%) compared to SF (3%) (
conclusionsThe current series illustrates variability in the surgical management of RCCs. SF with closed reconstruction is a reasonable operative strategy for most symptomatic RCCs cases while CWR can be reserved for selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.