Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358313›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

About the Analysis of 18S rDNA Sequence Data from Trypanosomes in Barcoding and Phylogenetics: Tracing a Continuation Error Occurring in the Literature.

Antonia S Rackevei, Alyssa Borges, Markus Engstler, Thomas Dandekar, Matthias Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonia S RackeveiDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Alyssa BorgesDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-1371
Markus EngstlerDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-5759
Thomas DandekarDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-7625
Matthias WolfDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

CAPES 88881.199683/2018-01DFG EN-305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variable regions (V1-V9) of the 18S rDNA are routinely used in barcoding and phylogenetics. In handling these data for trypanosomes, we have noticed a misunderstanding that has apparently taken a life of its own in the literature over the years. In particular, in recent years, when studying the phylogenetic relationship of trypanosomes, the use of V7/V8 was systematically established. However, considering the current numbering system for all other organisms (including other Euglenozoa), V7/V8 was never used. In Maia da Silva et al. [Parasitology 2004, 129, 549-561], V7/V8 was promoted for the first time for trypanosome phylogenetics, and since then, more than 70 publications have replicated this nomenclature and even discussed the benefits of the use of this region in comparison to V4. However, the primers used to amplify the variable region of trypanosomes have actually amplified V4 (concerning the current 18S rDNA numbering system).

Indexed as

RNA secondary structureTrypanosomaV1–V9V4V7/V8variable regions

Identifiers

PMID36358313
PMCPMC9687731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.