Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358215›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Physician-Targeted Interventions in Antibiotic Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice: A Systematic Review.

Stefan Cox, Kelly Lo-A-Foe, Minke van Hoof, Geert-Jan Dinant, Guy Oudhuis, Paul Savelkoul, Jochen Cals, Eefje de Bont

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan CoxDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6804-936X
Kelly Lo-A-FoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Minke van HoofDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan DinantDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Guy OudhuisDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Paul SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jochen CalsDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9550-5674
Eefje de BontDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 10150511910060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common reason for women to consult a general practitioner (GP). While UTIs are self-limiting in half of cases, most women are prescribed antibiotics, often in discordance with established guidelines. Researchers have employed different interventions to improve GPs' prescribing behavior, especially for respiratory infections, but it is uncertain whether these are effective for UTI care. Therefore, we performed a systematic review, including (cluster) randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of interventions targeted at GPs to improve antibiotic prescriptions for UTI. From September to December 2021 we searched the Medline, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases, ultimately including ten studies describing eleven trials. We determined the effect of the interventions on the decision to prescribe and on the choice of antibiotic. Results showed that most studies employed multifaceted interventions, most frequently including audit & feedback and/or educational meetings. Seven out of nine trials that recorded first-choice prescriptions saw an increased proportion of first-choice antibiotics in the intervention groups compared to control groups. The employed interventions also caused a decreased proportion of at least one broad-spectrum antibiotic in five out of six studies that measured broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions. However, the total number of antibiotic prescriptions for UTIs increased in four out of eight studies. Therefore, while effective at influencing GPs' prescribing behavior, future interventions should also focus on improving the decision to prescribe at all.

Indexed as

antibioticsantibiotic stewardshipfamily medicinesystematic reviewurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID36358215
PMCPMC9686805
OpenAlexW4308440135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.