Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357930›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2023

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Related Stress and Menstrual Changes.

Martina Anto-Ocrah, Tori Valachovic, Michael Chen, Kimberly Tiffany, Lindsey DeSplinter, Kimberly Kaukeinen, J Christopher Glantz, Stefanie Hollenbach

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina Anto-OcrahDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and the School of Medicine and Dentistry, the Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, and the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Rochester, Nazareth College, and the University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Tori Valachovic
Michael Chen
Kimberly Tiffany
Lindsey DeSplinter
Kimberly Kaukeinen
J Christopher Glantz
Stefanie Hollenbach
University of Rochester · US

Funding

EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS IN NEUROLOGICAL DISEASET32NS007338 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ROBERT G. HOLLOWAY, Michael P McDermott · 1990 to 2026
$6.4M
Menstrual Phase and Sexual Dysfunction After Concussion in WomenK01NS121199 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ANTO-OCRAH, MARTINA · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NINDS NIH HHS K01 NS121199NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate how stress related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected women's menstrual cycles. We hypothesized that women with high levels of COVID-19-related stress would have more menstrual changes compared with those with lower levels of stress.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional study design, we recruited a representative sample of U.S. adult women of reproductive age (18-45 years) using nonhormonal birth control to participate in an online REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture, Vanderbilt University) survey. COVID-19-related stress was assessed with the PSS-10-C (COVID-19 Pandemic-related Perceived Stress Scale) and dichotomized as low stress (scores lower than 25) and high stress (scores 25 or higher). Self-reported menstrual outcomes were identified as changes in cycle length, duration, or flow and increased frequency of spotting between cycles. We used χ 2 and Fisher exact tests to compare differences in outcome between the two stress groups and logistic regression models for effect estimates.

resultsA total of 354 women of reproductive age across the United States completed both the menstrual and COVID-19-related stress components of our survey. More than half of these women reported at least one change in their menstrual cycles since the start of the pandemic (n=191), and 10.5% reported high COVID-19-related stress (n=37). Compared with those with low COVID-19-related stress, a greater proportion of women with high COVID-19-related stress reported changes in cycle length (shorter or longer; P =.008), changes in period duration (shorter or longer; P <.001), heavier menstrual flow ( P =.035), and increased frequency of spotting between cycles ( P =.006) compared with prepandemic times. After adjusting for age, smoking history, obesity, education, and mental health history, high COVID-19-related stress was associated with increased odds of changes in menstrual cycle length (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.32; 95% CI 1.12-4.85), duration (aOR 2.38; 95% CI 1.14-4.98), and spotting (aOR 2.32; 95% CI 1.03-5.22). Our data also demonstrated a nonsignificant trend of heavier menstrual flow among women with high COVID-19-related stress (aOR 1.61; 95% CI 0.77-3.34).

conclusionHigh COVID-19-related stress is associated with significant changes in menstrual cycle length, alterations in period duration, and increased intermenstrual spotting as compared with before the pandemic. Given that menstrual health is frequently an indicator of women's overall well-being, clinicians, researchers, and public health officials must consider the association between COVID-19-related stress and menstrual disturbances.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleMenstruationMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36357930
PMCPMC9892200
OpenAlexW4308768406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.