Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357894›Full record

Observational studyMalaria journal2022

Acceptability of pre-referral rectal artesunate for severe malaria in children under 5 years by health workers and caregivers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria and Uganda.

Phyllis Awor, Joseph Kimera, Proscovia Athieno, Gloria Tumukunde, Jean Okitawutshu, Antoinette Tshefu, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Aita Signorell, Nina Brunner, Jean-Claude Kalenga and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Phyllis AworSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. pawor@musph.ac.ug.
Joseph KimeraSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Proscovia AthienoSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Gloria TumukundeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Jean OkitawutshuKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Antoinette TshefuKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Elizabeth OmoluabiAkena Associates, Abuja, Nigeria.
Aita SignorellSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Nina BrunnerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Jean-Claude KalengaKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Babatunde AkanoAkena Associates, Abuja, Nigeria.
Kazeem AyodejiAkena Associates, Abuja, Nigeria.
Charles OkonAkena Associates, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ocheche YusufAkena Associates, Abuja, Nigeria.
Giulia DelventoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Tristan LeeSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Christian BurriSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Christian LengelerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Manuel W HetzelSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Makerere University · UGUniversity of Basel · CHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor children below 6 years with suspected severe malaria attending a health care provider unable to provide parenteral malaria treatment, pre-referral rectal artesunate (RAS) is recommended by the World Health Organization to prevent death and disability. A number of African countries are in the process of rolling out quality-assured RAS for pre-referral treatment of severe malaria at community-level. The success of RAS depends, among other factors, on the acceptability of RAS in the communities where it is being rolled-out. Yet to date, there is limited literature on RAS acceptability. This study aimed to determine the acceptability of RAS by health care providers and child caregivers in communities where quality assured RAS was rolled out. This study was nested within the comprehensive multi-country observational research project Community Access to Rectal Artesunate for Malaria (CARAMAL), implemented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Nigeria, and Uganda between 2018 and 2020. Data from three different sources were analysed to understand RAS acceptability: interviews with health workers during three health care provider surveys (N = 341 community health workers and 467 primary health facility workers), with caregivers of children < 5 years of age during three household surveys (N = 9332 caregivers), and with caregivers of children < 5 years of age who were treated with RAS and enrolled in the CARAMAL Patient Surveillance System (N = 3645 caregivers).

resultsRAS acceptability was high among all interviewed stakeholders in the three countries. After the roll-out of RAS, 97-100% heath care providers in DRC, 98-100% in Nigeria and 93-100% in Uganda considered RAS as very good or good. Majority of caregivers whose children had received RAS for pre-referral management of severe malaria indicated that they would want to get the medication again, if their child had the same illness (99.8% of caregivers in DRC, 100% in Nigeria and 99.9% in Uganda). In three household surveys, 67-80% of caregivers whose children had not previously received RAS considered the medication as useful.

conclusionRAS was well accepted by health workers and child caregivers in DRC, Nigeria and Uganda. Acceptability is unlikely to be an obstacle to the large-scale roll-out of RAS in the studied settings.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsMalariaArtesunateCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health WorkersDemocratic Republic of the CongoHumansNigeriaReferral and ConsultationUgandaAntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunate

Identifiers

PMID36357894
PMCPMC9650828
OpenAlexW4308699152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.