Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357891›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2022

Education-related inequalities in beliefs and behaviors pertaining to COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Katherine Kirkby, Nicole Bergen, Cecilia Vidal Fuertes, Anne Schlotheuber, Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine KirkbyDivision of Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact, Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nicole BergenDivision of Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact, Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cecilia Vidal FuertesDivision of Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact, Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne SchlotheuberDivision of Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact, Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ahmad Reza HosseinpoorDivision of Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact, Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. hosseinpoora@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus pandemic has exposed existing social inequalities in relation to disease preventive behaviors, risk of exposure, testing and healthcare access, and consequences as a result of illness and containment measures across different population groups. However, due to a lack of data, to date there has been limited evidence of the extent of such within-country inequalities globally.

methodsWe examined education-related inequalities in four COVID-19 prevention and testing indicators within 90 countries, using data from the University of Maryland Social Data Science Center Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey, in partnership with Facebook, over the period 1 June 2021 to 31 December 2021. The overall level of education-related inequalities, as well as how they differ across country income groups and how they have changed over time were analyzed using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). We also assessed whether these education-related inequalities were associated with government policies and responses.

resultsEducation-related inequalities in beliefs, mask wearing, social distancing and testing varied across the study countries. Mask wearing and beliefs in the effectiveness of social distancing and mask wearing were overall more common among people with a higher level of education. Even after controlling for other sociodemographic and health-related factors, social distancing practice was higher among the most educated in low/lower middle income countries, but was higher overall among the least educated in high income countries. Overall there were low education-related inequalities in COVID-19 testing, though there was variation across countries.

conclusionsThe study highlights important within-country education-related differences in COVID-19 beliefs, preventive behaviors and testing, as well as differing trends across country income groups. This has implications for considering and targeting specific population groups when designing public health interventions and messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic and future health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingEducational StatusHumansPandemicsSocioeconomic FactorsCOVID-19 preventive behaviorCOVID-19 testingEducation-related inequalityMask useNon-pharmaceutical interventionsSocial distancingWithin-country inequality

Identifiers

PMID36357891
PMCPMC9648879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.