Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357874›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

A novel focal adhesion-related risk model predicts prognosis of bladder cancer -- a bioinformatic study based on TCGA and GEO database.

Jiyuan Hu, Linhui Wang, Luanfeng Li, Yutao Wang, Jianbin Bi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiyuan Hu *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Linhui Wang *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Luanfeng Li *Department of Pharmacology, China Medical University, School of Pharmacy of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yutao WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Jianbin BiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. jianbinbi@cmu.edu.cn.
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer (BLCA) is the ninth most common cancer globally, as well as the fourth most common cancer in men, with an incidence of 7%. However, few effective prognostic biomarkers or models of BLCA are available at present.

methodsThe prognostic genes of BLCA were screened from one cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database through univariate Cox regression analysis and functionally annotated by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis. The intersecting genes of the BLCA gene set and focal adhesion-related gene were obtained and subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) to construct a prognostic model. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of high- and low-risk patients was performed to explore further the biological process related to focal adhesion genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (KM) were used to evaluate the prognostic model. DNA methylation analysis was presented to explore the relationship between prognosis and gene methylation. Furthermore, immune cell infiltration was assessed by CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE, and TIMER. The model was verified in an external GSE32894 cohort of the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and the Prognoscan database presented further validation of genes. The HPA database validated the related protein level, and functional experiments verified significant risk factors in the model.

resultsVCL, COL6A1, RAC3, PDGFD, JUN, LAMA2, and ITGB6 were used to construct a prognostic model in the TCGA-BLCA cohort and validated in the GSE32894 cohort. The 7-gene model successfully stratified the patients into both cohorts' high- and low-risk groups. The higher risk score was associated with a worse prognosis.

conclusionsThe 7-gene prognostic model can classify BLCA patients into high- and low-risk groups based on the risk score and predict the overall survival, which may aid clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyFocal AdhesionsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMalePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBladder cancerComputational biologyFocal adhesionImmune infiltrationRisk signature

Identifiers

PMID36357874
PMCPMC9647995
OpenAlexW4309245628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.