Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357859›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2022

Construction of an SNP fingerprinting database and population genetic analysis of 329 cauliflower cultivars.

Yuyao Yang, Mingjie Lyu, Jun Liu, Jianjin Wu, Qian Wang, Tianyu Xie, Haichao Li, Rui Chen, Deling Sun, Yingxia Yang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comprehensive Evaluation and DNA Fingerprints ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuyao Yang *Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Mingjie Lyu *Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Jun LiuNational Key Facility for Crop Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jianjin WuTianjin Agricultural Development Service Center, Tianjin, 300061, China.
Qian WangTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Tianyu XieTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Haichao LiTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Rui ChenTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Deling SunTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Yingxia YangTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China. yingxiayang@126.com.
Xingwei YaoTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300192, China. yaoxingwei99@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cauliflower is one of the most important vegetable crops grown worldwide. However, the lack of genetic diversity information and efficient molecular markers hinders efforts to improve cauliflower. This study aims to construct DNA fingerprints for 329 cauliflower cultivars based on SNP markers and the KASP system. After rigorous filtering, a total of 1662 candidate SNPs were obtained from nearly 17.9 million SNP loci. The mean values of PIC, MAF, heterozygosity and gene diversity of these SNPs were 0.389, 0.419, 0.075, and 0.506, respectively. We developed a program for in silico simulations on 153 core germplasm samples to generate ideal SNP marker sets from the candidates. Finally, 41 highly polymorphic KASP markers were selected and applied to identify 329 cauliflower cultivars, mainly collected from the public market. Furthermore, based on the KASP genotyping data, we performed phylogenetic analysis and population structure analysis of the 329 cultivars. As a result, these cultivars could be classified into three major clusters, and the classification patterns were significantly related to their curd solidity and geographical origin. Finally, fingerprints of the 329 cultivars and 2D barcodes with the genetic information of each sample were generated. The fingerprinting database developed in this study provides a practical tool for identifying the authenticity and purity of cauliflower seeds and valuable genetic information about the current cauliflower cultivars.

Indexed as

BrassicaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA FingerprintingGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationPhylogenyCauliflowerDNA fingerprintingKASPPopulation structureSNP

Identifiers

PMID36357859
PMCPMC9647966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.