Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357831›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Skilled antenatal care services utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a pooled analysis of demographic and health surveys from 32 countries.

Kwamena Sekyi Dickson, Joshua Okyere, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Tarif Salihu, Vincent Bediako, Bernard Afriyie Owusu, Eugene Budu, Wonder Agbemavi, Jane Odurowaah Edjah and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kwamena Sekyi DicksonDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Joshua OkyereDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. joshuaokyere54@gmail.com.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.
Abdul-Aziz SeiduCentre for Gender and Advocacy, Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi, Ghana.
Tarif SalihuDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Vincent BediakoDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Bernard Afriyie OwusuDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Eugene BuduKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box, 77, Accra, Ghana.
Wonder AgbemaviDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Jane Odurowaah EdjahGuidance and Counselling Centre, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Eugene Kofuor Maafo DartehDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEach day, an estimated 800 women die from preventable pregnancy and childbirth related complications, where 99% of these avoidable deaths happen in low-and middle-income countries. Skilled attendance during antenatal care (ANC) plays a role in reducing maternal and child mortality. However, the factors that predict the utilisation of skilled ANC services in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains sparsely investigated. Therefore, we examined women's utilisation of skilled ANC services in SSA.

methodsThe research used pooled data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 32 countries in SSA between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the predictors of skilled ANC services utilisation. The results are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsThe prevalence of skilled ANC services utilisation in SSA was 76.0%, with the highest and lowest prevalence in Gambia (99.2%) and Burundi (8.4%), respectively. Lower odds of ANC from skilled providers was found among women aged 45-49 compared to those aged 20-24 (aOR = 0.86, CI = 0.79-0.94); widowed women compared to married women (aOR = 0.84, CI = 0.72-0.99); women who consider getting permission to visit the health facility as a big problem compared to those who consider that as not a big problem (aOR = 0.74, CI = 0.71-0.77); women who consider getting money needed for treatment as not a big problem compared to those who consider that as a big problem (aOR = 0.84, CI = 0.72-0.99); and women who consider distance to the health facility as a big problem compared to those who consider that as not a big problem (aOR = 0.75, CI = 0.72-0.77).

conclusionSSA has relatively high prevalence of skilled ANC services utilisation, however, there are substantial country-level disparities that need to be prioritised. Increasing maternal reproductive age being widowed and far distance to health facility were factors that predicted lower likelihood of skilled ANC services utilisation. There is, therefore, the need to intensify female formal education, invest in community-based healthcare facilities in rural areas and leverage on the media in advocating for skilled ANC services utilisation.

Indexed as

Facilities and Services UtilizationPrenatal CareChildChild MortalityFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth SurveysHumansOdds RatioPregnancyAntenatal carePublic healthSkilledSocial demographySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID36357831
PMCPMC9650845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.