Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357765›Full record

SynthesisHead and neck pathology2023

Diagnostic Reliability of CRTC1/3::MAML2 Gene Fusion Transcripts in Discriminating Histologically Similar Intraosseous Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma from Glandular Odontogenic Cyst: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

R Keerthika, Anju Devi, Mala Kamboj, N Sivakumar, Gopikrishnan Vijayakumar, Anjali Narwal, Akhil Girdhar

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Head and neck pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinicopathological Profile of Intraosseous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Jaws: A Systematic Review.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R KeerthikaDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India. keerthikarajseetha1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-176X
Anju DeviDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
Mala KambojDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
N SivakumarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology & Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003, India.
Gopikrishnan VijayakumarDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
Anjali NarwalDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
Akhil GirdharDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India.
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INKing George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma (IMEC) and Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) are those two pathological entities causing diagnostic dilemma due to the histopathological similarity. An accurate distinction between the two entities is difficult as both presents with a common radiological and histological similarities. The aim of our systematic review was to establish the diagnostic reliability of CRTC1/3::MAML2 gene fusion for the distinction between IMEC and GOC.

methodsA complete electronic literature search was made in MEDLINE by PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases. Articles with keywords using molecular genetic findings of CRTC1/3::MAML2 gene fusion transcripts, IMEC and GOC were assessed and included for the systematic review.

resultsTwelve subgroups having both qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed CRTC1/3::MAML2 sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 70.59% in differentiating GOC and IMEC. Fixed-effects model confirmed translocation-negative cases to have a decreased risk of association with IMEC (combined odds ratio 8.770, 95% confidence interval - 2.45 to 31.45, p < 0.002).

conclusionsThe current evidence supports that in all cases with positive gene fusion transcript of the CRTC1/3::MAML2 was specific for IMEC and was significantly differentiating it from GOC. Whereas cases of IMEC with negative gene fusion transcript pose diagnostic difficulty in differentiating from a GOC which is negative for CRTC1/3::MAML2 expression.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, MucoepidermoidMouth NeoplasmsOdontogenic CystsDNA-Binding ProteinsGene FusionHumansOncogene Proteins, FusionReproducibility of ResultsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsCRTC1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsMAML2 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsCRTC1/3Gene fusion transcriptsGlandular odontogenic cystIntraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinomaMAML2

Identifiers

PMID36357765
PMCPMC10063707
OpenAlexW4308695911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.