Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357642›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022

Emerging innovations for lumbar spondylolisthesis management: a systematic review of active and prospective clinical trials.

Daniel Jeremiah Harrison, Archis R Bhandarkar, Sulaman Durrani, Cameron Zamanian, Rohin Singh, Mohamad Bydon

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Jeremiah HarrisonMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1St Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Archis R BhandarkarMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1St Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sulaman DurraniMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1St Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Cameron ZamanianMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1St Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Rohin SinghMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mohamad BydonMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1St Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. bydon.mohamad@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature has had some conflicting evidence regarding the effective management of lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS). Herein, we review active and prospective clinical trials to identify the emerging trends for the management of LS. A systematic search was conducted utilizing the NIH Clinical Trials database using the search term "lumbar spondylolisthesis" on February 2, 2022. Currently active and prospective clinical trials for LS were included and analyzed. All statistical analyses were performed on R 4.1.2. We identified 37 clinical trials. Nearly half the trials (n = 18, 48.6%) include novel technologies; 6 (16.2%) are comparing surgical approaches, of which 4 (67%) include decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion; 6 (16.2%) are evaluating perioperative pain management protocols, of which 3 (50%) include bupivacaine or ropivacaine; 3 (8.1%) are evaluating alternative medicines in LS; 2 (5.4%) are observational studies about the natural history of LS; 1 (2.7%) involves surgical infection prophylaxis; and 1 (2.7%) is evaluating AK1320 microspheres. The 18 trials involving novel technologies include 3D-printed titanium cages (n = 3, 16.7%), interbody implants (n = 4, 22.2%), bone graft materials (n = 4, 22.2%), and miscellaneous intraoperative devices (n = 7, 38.9%). The top 3 outcomes measured were Oswestry Disability Index (n = 28, 75.7%), visual analog scale (n = 21, 56.7%), and postoperative radiographs (n = 16, 43.2%). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were included in 34 (91.9%) trials, while 23 (62.2%) trials included lumbar spine imaging. LS can often require a multifaceted approach. Novel technologies and utilization of PROMs appear to be a significant emerging trend in LS management.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionSpondylolisthesisHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnterolisthesisLumbar spondylolisthesisRetrolisthesisSpinal surgerySpineTrial

Identifiers

PMID36357642
OpenAlexW4308933627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.