Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357609›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Comparison of convolutional neural networks for classification of vocal fold nodules from high-speed video images.

Christian Frederik Larsen, Mette Pedersen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transforming ENT Healthcare: Advancements and Implications of Artificial Intelligence.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian Frederik LarsenCopenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark. christian.f.l@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8228-3686
Mette PedersenMedical Centre Østergade 18, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3566-8513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeep learning is in this study used through convolutional neural networks (CNN) to the determination of vocal fold nodules. Through high-speed video (HSV) images and computer-assisted tools, a comparison of convolutional neural network models and their accuracy will be presented.

methodsThe data have been collected by an Ear Nose Throat (ENT) specialist with a 90° rigid scope in the years from 2007 to 2019, where 15.732 high-speed videos have been collected from 7909 patients. A total of 4000 images have been carefully selected, 2000 images were of normal vocal folds and 2000 images were of vocal folds with varying degrees of vocal fold nodules. These images were then split into training-, validation-, and testing-data set, for use with a CNN model with 5 layers (CNN5) and compared to other models: VGG19, MobileNetV2, and Inception-ResNetV2. To compare the neural network models, the following evaluation metrics have been calculated: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and negative predictive values.

resultsAll the trained CNN models have shown high accuracy when applied to the test set. The accuracy is 97.75%, 83.5%, 91.5%, and 89.75%, for CNN5, VGG19, MobileNetV2, and InceptionResNetV2, respectively.

conclusionsPrecision was identified as the most relevant performance metric for a study that focuses on the classification of vocal fold nodules. The highest performing model was MobilNetV2 with a precision of 97.7%. The average accuracy across all 4 neural networks was 90.63% showing that neural networks can be used for classifying vocal fold nodules in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerVocal CordsHumansClassificationConvolutional neural networksHigh-speed videoLaryngoscopyVocal fold nodules

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.