ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
Comparison of convolutional neural networks for classification of vocal fold nodules from high-speed video images.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying Phonotrauma Severity from Vocal Fold Images with Soft Ordinal Regression.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2026Article
- Vocal performance evaluation of the intelligent note recognition method based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transforming ENT Healthcare: Advancements and Implications of Artificial Intelligence.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Convolutional neural network-based vocal cord tumor classification technique for home-based self-prescreening purpose.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDeep learning is in this study used through convolutional neural networks (CNN) to the determination of vocal fold nodules. Through high-speed video (HSV) images and computer-assisted tools, a comparison of convolutional neural network models and their accuracy will be presented.
methodsThe data have been collected by an Ear Nose Throat (ENT) specialist with a 90° rigid scope in the years from 2007 to 2019, where 15.732 high-speed videos have been collected from 7909 patients. A total of 4000 images have been carefully selected, 2000 images were of normal vocal folds and 2000 images were of vocal folds with varying degrees of vocal fold nodules. These images were then split into training-, validation-, and testing-data set, for use with a CNN model with 5 layers (CNN5) and compared to other models: VGG19, MobileNetV2, and Inception-ResNetV2. To compare the neural network models, the following evaluation metrics have been calculated: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and negative predictive values.
resultsAll the trained CNN models have shown high accuracy when applied to the test set. The accuracy is 97.75%, 83.5%, 91.5%, and 89.75%, for CNN5, VGG19, MobileNetV2, and InceptionResNetV2, respectively.
conclusionsPrecision was identified as the most relevant performance metric for a study that focuses on the classification of vocal fold nodules. The highest performing model was MobilNetV2 with a precision of 97.7%. The average accuracy across all 4 neural networks was 90.63% showing that neural networks can be used for classifying vocal fold nodules in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36357609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.