Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357566›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2023

An ensemble method based on marginal-effect models (EMM) for estimating usual food intake from single-day dietary data and internal/external two-day dietary data.

Sang Ah Chi, Heejin Lee, Jung Eun Lee, Haeng-Shin Lee, Kyunga Kim, In-Kwon Yeo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sang Ah ChiDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Heejin LeeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-6726
Jung Eun LeeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1141-878X
Haeng-Shin LeeDepartment of Global Healthcare, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Cheongju, Korea.
Kyunga KimBiomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. kyunga.j.kim@samsung.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0865-2236
In-Kwon YeoDepartment of Statistics, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. inkwon@sookmyung.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) 17162MFDS026Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs | Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (KCDC) 2019E340200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith collection of repeated 24-hour recalls, there exist challenges in usual intake estimation, including infeasibility of multiple dietary assessments, and shortage of non-zero intakes for episodically consumed foods.

objectivesWe developed an ensemble method based on marginal-effect models (EMM), which estimates usual intake distribution using single-day data with internal or external two-day data.

methodsThe performance of the EMM was evaluated and compared with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method and NCI 1-d method, via simulations with various scenarios and real data analyses of red meat, fish, and protein from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).

resultsSimulations indicated the EMM (maximum bias of 1.67, 3.17, 8.57, 11.63 for average, median, 75%-tile, 95%-tile, respectively) provided more accurate estimation than the NCI method (maximum bias of 4.18, 9.43, 7.56, 37.43) across various scenarios on intake probability and within-person variation. The EMM showed robust estimation when an insufficient number of people have positive consumption on two days. In simulations with various external variance ratios, the EMM showed similar or superior performance to the NCI 1-d method. The EMM produced more stable estimates of usual intake distributions for red meat, fish, and protein than the two NCI methods.

conclusionThe proposed EMM showed substantial improvement over the NCI methods when data contain a relatively small number of people with positive consumption on two days; is robust when food intake probability is very low or high; and estimates an external variance ratio with relatively low bias.

Indexed as

DietFoodAnimalsEatingHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Nutrition SurveysUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.