Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357505›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided system for knee osteoarthritis assessment increases experienced orthopaedic surgeons' agreement rate and accuracy.

Maria Anna Smolle, Christoph Goetz, Dietmar Maurer, Ines Vielgut, Michael Novak, Gerhard Zier, Andreas Leithner, Stefan Nehrer, Tiago Paixao, Richard Ljuhar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Anna Smolle *Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Christoph Goetz *ImageBiopsy Lab, Zehetnergasse 6/2/2, 1140, Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar MaurerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Landeskrankenhaus Südsteiermark, Standort Radkersburg, Dr.-Schwaiger-Straße 1, 8490, Bad Radkersburg, Austria.
Ines VielgutDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Michael NovakDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Gerhard ZierDiagnosehaus, Hans-Sachs-Gasse 10-12, 1180, Wien, Austria.
Andreas LeithnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Stefan NehrerDanube University Krems, Dr. Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Austria.
Tiago PaixaoImageBiopsy Lab, Zehetnergasse 6/2/2, 1140, Vienna, Austria.
Richard LjuharImageBiopsy Lab, Zehetnergasse 6/2/2, 1140, Vienna, Austria.
Patrick SadoghiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. patrick.sadoghi@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1767-555X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of this study were to (1) analyze the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer system on the accuracy and agreement rate of board-certified orthopaedic surgeons (= senior readers) to detect X-ray features indicative of knee OA in comparison to unaided assessment and (2) compare the results to those of senior residents (= junior readers).

methodsOne hundred and twenty-four unilateral knee X-rays from the OAI study were analyzed regarding Kellgren-Lawrence grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), sclerosis and osteophyte OARSI grade by computerized methods. Images were rated for these parameters by three senior readers using two modalities: plain X-ray (unaided) and X-ray presented alongside reports from a computer-assisted detection system (aided). After exclusion of nine images with incomplete annotation, intraclass correlations between readers were calculated for both modalities among 115 images, and reader performance was compared to ground truth (OAI consensus). Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were also calculated and the results were compared to those from a previous study on junior readers.

resultsWith the aided modality, senior reader agreement rates for KL grade (2.0-fold), sclerosis (1.42-fold), JSN (1.37-fold) and osteophyte OARSI grades (3.33-fold) improved significantly. Reader specificity and accuracy increased significantly for all features when using the aided modality compared to the gold standard. On the other hand, sensitivity only increased for OA diagnosis, whereas it decreased (without statistical significance) for all other features. With aided analysis, senior readers reached similar agreement and accuracy rates as junior readers, with both surpassing AI performance.

conclusionThe introduction of AI-based computer-aided assessment systems can increase the agreement rate and overall accuracy for knee OA diagnosis among board-certified orthopaedic surgeons. Thus, use of this software may improve the standard of care for knee OA detection and diagnosis in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Orthopedic SurgeonsOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteophyteArtificial IntelligenceComputersHumansKnee JointSclerosisArtificial intelligenceComputer aided detectionKnee osteoarthritisReader study

Identifiers

PMID36357505
PMCPMC9958164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.