Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357472›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK.

Elizabeth Smout, Khine Phyu, Gareth J Hughes, Lee Parker, Roozbeh Rezai, Amy Evans, Joscelyne McLaren, Stephen Bush, Sarah Davey, Mark A Aldersley and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth SmoutUK Field Epidemiology Training Programme, UK Health Security Agency, Leeds, UK.
Khine PhyuLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Gareth J HughesField Service, UK Health Security Agency, Leeds, UK.
Lee ParkerLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Roozbeh RezaiLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Amy EvansLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Joscelyne McLarenLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Stephen BushLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Sarah DaveyLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Mark A AldersleyLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Murad RufPublic Health, Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences Ltd, London, UK.
Emma E PageLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK. emma.page7@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative testing approaches and care pathways are required to meet HIV, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) elimination goals. Routine testing for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) within emergency departments (EDs) is suggested by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control but there is a paucity of supporting evidence. We evaluated the introduction of routine BBV testing in EDs at a large teaching hospital in northern England. In October 2018, we modified the electronic laboratory ordering system to reflex opt-out HIV, HBV and HCV testing for all ED attendees aged 16-65 years who had a routine blood test for urea and electrolytes (U&Es). Linkage to care (LTC) was attempted for newly diagnosed patients, those never referred and those who had previously disengaged from care. The project operated for 18 months, here we present evaluation of the initial nine months (2 October 2018-1 July 2019). We analysed testing uptake, BBV seropositivity, LTC and treatment initiation within six months post-diagnosis. Over 9 months, 17,026/28,178 (60.4%) ED attendees who had U&Es performed were tested for ≥ 1 BBV. 299 active BBV infections were identified: 70 HIV Ab/Ag-positive (0.4% seroprevalence), 73 HBsAg-positive (0.4%) and 156 HCV RNA-positive (1.0%). Only 24.3% (17/70) HIV Ab/Ag-positive individuals required LTC, compared to 94.9% (148/156) HCV RNA-positive and 53.4% (39/73) HBsAg-positive individuals. LTC was successful in 94.1% (16/17) HIV Ab/Ag-positive and 69.3% (27/39) HBsAg-positive individuals. However, at 6 months LTC was just 39.2% (58/148) for HCV RNA-positive individuals, with 64% (37/58) of these commencing treatment. Universal opt-out ED BBV testing proved feasible and effective in identifying active BBV infections, especially among marginalised populations with reduced healthcare access. Our integrated approach achieved good LTC rates although further service development is necessary, particularly for HCV RNA-positive people who inject drugs.

Indexed as

Hepatitis BHepatitis CHIV InfectionsEmergency Service, HospitalHepacivirusHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansRNASeroepidemiologic StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomHepatitis B Surface AntigensRNA

Identifiers

PMID36357472
PMCPMC9648896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.