Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Machine learning-assisted analysis for agronomic dataset of 49 Balangu (Lallemantia iberica L.) ecotypes from different regions of Iran.

Jalil Shafagh-Kolvanagh, Hassan Dehghanian, Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi-Nassab, Mohammad Moghaddam, Yaegoob Raei, Saeid Zehtab Salmasi, Peyvand Samimifar, Soheila Abdoli, Behnam Gholizadeh-Khajeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jalil Shafagh-KolvanaghDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. shafagh.jalil@gmail.com.
Hassan DehghanianDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi-NassabDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad MoghaddamDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Breeding, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Yaegoob RaeiDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Saeid Zehtab SalmasiDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Peyvand SamimifarDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Soheila AbdoliDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Behnam Gholizadeh-KhajehDepartment of Plant Ecophysiology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Balangu (Lallemantia iberica) species have a high gastronomical impact in the Middle East and Balkan region. It is widely used in the local food industry, such as confectionery, edible oil, and protein food. In this study, 49 ecotypes were collected from different regions of Iran. 37 agronomic traits were measured during the growing season and at harvest time. To find the correlation between the grain yield per unit area, grain yield per single plant (GYSP), oil percent (OP), and protein percent (PP) with other measured traits, which these were utilized as the labels of different machine learning (ML) procedures including Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Regression (GBDTR). It was observed that there is a linear relationship between the measured agronomic traits and the considered labels. So, the LR, RFR, and GBDTR models showed the lowest mean absolute error, mean square error, and root mean square error than SVR models and good prediction ability of the test data. Although, the RFR and GBDTR have naturally lower bias than other methods in this study, but the GBDTR scheme is preferred because of the over-fitting shortcoming of the RFR technique. The GBDTR method showed better results rather than the other ML regression methods according to the RMSE 3.302, 0.040, 0.028, and 0.060 for GYUA, GYSP, OP, and PP, respectively.

Indexed as

EcotypeLamiaceaeIranMachine LearningPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36357455
PMCPMC9649721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.