ArticleScientific reports2022
Hemorrhagic risk prediction in coronary artery disease patients based on photoplethysmography and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorrhagic events are the main focus of attention during antithrombosis therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aims to investigate the potential of using photoplethysmography (PPG) and machine learning techniques to assess hemorrhagic risk in patients with CAD. A total of 1638 patients with CAD were enrolled from January 2018 to October 2019, among which 114 patients were observed to have at least one positive event. Importantly, 102 patients with 9933 records were finally retained for analysis in this study. Participants were required to collect data using the portable PPG acquisition device and the specially designed Android APP. The data was collected and uploaded to a remote server. Based on collected PPG signals, we extracted features in a total of 30 dimensions from time-domain, frequency-domain, and wavelet packet decomposition. Logistic regression, support vector regression, random forest, and XGBoost regression models were established to achieve hemorrhagic risk evaluation, and then, their performances were compared. In total, 10 features extracted from PPG showed statistical significance (p < 0.01) between negative and positive groups. The newly established XGBoost model performed best in the hemorrhagic risk evaluation experiment, wherein the mean area under the curve (AUC) with tenfold cross-validation was 0.762 ± 0.024 and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.679 ± 0.051 and 0.714 ± 0.014, respectively. We established a data acquisition system for PPG signal collection, and demonstrated that a set of features extracted from PPG and the proposed machine learning model are promising in the evaluation of hemorrhagic risk among patients with CAD. In comparison with the traditional HAS-BLED score, the proposed method can obtain the quantitative risk prediction probability from a single PPG record, which has the advantages of dynamics and continuity, and can provide timely feedback for doctors' antithrombotic treatment, which is of great significance for doctors to quickly determine the effectiveness of the treatment and adjust the timely treatment plans accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.