ArticleScientific reports2022
Brain tumor classification based on neural architecture search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging single-cell and spatial omics for brain tumour insights to improve therapeutic strategies.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- BrainView: A cloud-based deep learning system for brain image segmentation, tumor detection and visualization.Biomedical journal · 2026Article
- FS-FCN: a frequency-spatial fusion convolutional network for brain tumor classification in MR images.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Brain Tumour Classification Model Based on Spatial Block-Residual Block Collaborative Architecture with Strip Pooling Feature Fusion.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Hierarchical multi-scale vision transformer model for accurate detection and classification of brain tumors in MRI-based medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Class Brain Tumor Grades Classification Using a Deep Learning-Based Majority Voting Algorithm and Its Validation Using Explainable-AI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Learning Architecture for Brain Tumor Classification Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Classic and ResNet50.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advanced deep learning-based brain tumor classification using a novel customized CNN and optimized residual network.PloS one · 2025Article
- Non-coding RNAs as key players in neurodegeneration and brain tumors: Insights into therapeutic strategies.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Review
- Improving image classification of gastrointestinal endoscopy using curriculum self-supervised learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- NeuroNet19: an explainable deep neural network model for the classification of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in the Use of Deep Learning for the Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Image in Neuro-Oncology.Cancers · 2024Review
- Efficient Skip Connections-Based Residual Network (ESRNet) for Brain Tumor Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Segmentation and classification of brain tumors using fuzzy 3D highlighting and machine learning.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- The first case of glioma detected by an artificial intelligence algorithm running on real-time data in neurosurgery: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor is a life-threatening disease and causes about 0.25 million deaths worldwide in 2020. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is frequently used for diagnosing brain tumors. In medically underdeveloped regions, physicians who can accurately diagnose and assess the severity of brain tumors from MRI are highly lacking. Deep learning methods have been developed to assist physicians in detecting brain tumors from MRI and determining their subtypes. In existing methods, neural architectures are manually designed by human experts, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address this problem, we propose to automatically search for high-performance neural architectures for classifying brain tumors from MRIs, by leveraging a Learning-by-Self-Explanation (LeaSE) architecture search method. LeaSE consists of an explainer model and an audience model. The explainer aims at searching for a highly performant architecture by encouraging the architecture to generate high-fidelity explanations of prediction outcomes, where explanations' fidelity is evaluated by the audience model. LeaSE is formulated as a four-level optimization problem involving a sequence of four learning stages which are conducted end-to-end. We apply LeaSE for MRI-based brain tumor classification, including four classes: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and healthy, on a dataset containing 3264 MRI images. Results show that our method can search for neural architectures that achieve better classification accuracy than manually designed deep neural networks while having fewer model parameters. For example, our method achieves a test accuracy of 90.6% and an AUC of 95.6% with 3.75M parameters while the accuracy and AUC of a human-designed network-ResNet101-is 84.5% and 90.1% respectively with 42.56M parameters. In addition, our method outperforms state-of-the-art neural architecture search methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.