Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357435›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Predicting willingness to donate blood based on machine learning: two blood donor recruitments during COVID-19 outbreaks.

Hong-Yun Wu, Zheng-Gang Li, Xin-Kai Sun, Wei-Min Bai, An-di Wang, Yu-Chi Ma, Ren-Hua Diao, Eng-Yong Fan, Fang Zhao, Yun-Qi Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hong-Yun Wu *Jiangsu Province Blood Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Zheng-Gang Li *Yangzhou Blood Station, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Kai Sun *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Min Bai *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
An-di Wang *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Chi MaJiangsu Province Blood Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Ren-Hua DiaoYangzhou Blood Station, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Eng-Yong FanYangzhou Blood Station, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Fang ZhaoJiangsu Province Blood Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yun-Qi LiuNanjing Foreign Language School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yi-Zhou HongNanjing Foreign Language School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Ming-Hua GuoYangzhou Blood Station, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. guominghua66@sina.com.
Hui XueSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. hxue@seu.edu.cn.
Wen-Biao LiangJiangsu Province Blood Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. wenbiaoliang@hotmail.com.

Funding

Social development science and technology project of Jiangsu Province BE2017757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning methods are a novel way to predict and rank donors' willingness to donate blood and to achieve precision recruitment, which can improve the recruitment efficiency and meet the challenge of blood shortage. We collected information about experienced blood donors via short message service (SMS) recruitment and developed 7 machine learning-based recruitment models using PyCharm-Python Environment and 13 features which were described as a method for ranking and predicting donors' intentions to donate blood with a floating number between 0 and 1. Performance of the prediction models was assessed by the Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score in the full dataset, and by the accuracy in the four sub-datasets. The developed models were applied to prospective validations of recruiting experienced blood donors during two COVID-19 pandemics, while the routine method was used as a control. Overall, a total of 95,476 recruitments via SMS and their donation results were enrolled in our modelling study. The strongest predictor features for the donation of experienced donors were blood donation interval, age, and donation frequency. Among the seven baseline models, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Support vector machine models (SVM) achieved the best performance: mean (95%CI) with the highest AUC: 0.809 (0.806-0.811), accuracy: 0.815 (0.812-0.818), precision: 0.840 (0.835-0.845), and F1 score of XGBoost: 0.843 (0.840-0.845) and recall of SVM: 0.991 (0.988-0.994). The hit rate of the XGBoost model alone and the combined XGBoost and SVM models were 1.25 and 1.80 times higher than that of the conventional method as a control in 2 recruitments respectively, and the hit rate of the high willingness to donate group was 1.96 times higher than that of the low willingness to donate group. Our results suggested that the machine learning models could predict and determine the experienced donors with a strong willingness to donate blood by a ranking score based on personalized donation data and demographical details, significantly improve the recruitment rate of blood donors and help blood agencies to maintain the blood supply in emergencies.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHumansIntentionMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36357435
PMCPMC9647248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.