ArticleScientific reports2022
Machine learning-based assessment of storm surge in the New York metropolitan area.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconstruction of Extreme Sea Levels in coastal China using Multiple Deep Learning models.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Sea level variability and modeling in the Gulf of Guinea using supervised machine learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A novel deep learning approach for typhoon-induced storm surge modeling through efficient emulation of wind and pressure fields.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Modeling of land subsidence using GIS-based artificial neural network in Yunlin County, Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Storm surge generated from low-probability high-consequence tropical cyclones is a major flood hazard to the New York metropolitan area and its assessment requires a large number of storm scenarios. High-fidelity hydrodynamic numerical simulations can predict surge levels from storm scenarios. However, an accurate prediction requires a relatively fine computational grid, which is computationally expensive, especially when including wave effects. Towards alleviating the computational burden, Machine Learning models are developed to determine long-term average recurrence of flood levels induced by tropical cyclones in the New York metropolitan area. The models are trained and verified using a data set generated from physics-based hydrodynamic simulations to predict peak storm surge height, defined as the maximum induced water level due to wind stresses on the water surface and wave setup, at four coastal sites. In the generated data set, the number of low probability high-level storm surges was much smaller than the number of high probability low-level storm surges. This resulted in an imbalanced data set, a challenge that is addressed and resolved in this study. The results show that return period curves generated based on storm surge predictions from machine learning models are in good agreement with curves generated from high-fidelity hydrodynamic simulations, with the advantage that the machine learning model results are obtained in a fraction of the computational time required to run the simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.