Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357413›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Machine learning-based assessment of storm surge in the New York metropolitan area.

Mahmoud Ayyad, Muhammad R Hajj, Reza Marsooli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud AyyadDavidson Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA. mayyad@stevens.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-9313
Muhammad R HajjDavidson Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Reza MarsooliDavidson Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Stevens Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Storm surge generated from low-probability high-consequence tropical cyclones is a major flood hazard to the New York metropolitan area and its assessment requires a large number of storm scenarios. High-fidelity hydrodynamic numerical simulations can predict surge levels from storm scenarios. However, an accurate prediction requires a relatively fine computational grid, which is computationally expensive, especially when including wave effects. Towards alleviating the computational burden, Machine Learning models are developed to determine long-term average recurrence of flood levels induced by tropical cyclones in the New York metropolitan area. The models are trained and verified using a data set generated from physics-based hydrodynamic simulations to predict peak storm surge height, defined as the maximum induced water level due to wind stresses on the water surface and wave setup, at four coastal sites. In the generated data set, the number of low probability high-level storm surges was much smaller than the number of high probability low-level storm surges. This resulted in an imbalanced data set, a challenge that is addressed and resolved in this study. The results show that return period curves generated based on storm surge predictions from machine learning models are in good agreement with curves generated from high-fidelity hydrodynamic simulations, with the advantage that the machine learning model results are obtained in a fraction of the computational time required to run the simulations.

Indexed as

Cyclonic StormsFloodsMachine LearningNew YorkWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID36357413
PMCPMC9649765
OpenAlexW4309075705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.