Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357381›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define COVID-19 severity and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.

Qin Liu, Qi Su, Fen Zhang, Hein M Tun, Joyce Wing Yan Mak, Grace Chung-Yan Lui, Susanna So Shan Ng, Jessica Y L Ching, Amy Li, Wenqi Lu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. VSL#3British journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Translating insights into therapies for Long Covid.Science translational medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Qin Liu *Microbiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2924-7309
Qi Su *Microbiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9100-387X
Fen ZhangMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0887-1073
Hein M TunMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Joyce Wing Yan MakMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Grace Chung-Yan LuiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5242-2967
Susanna So Shan NgDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jessica Y L ChingMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Amy LiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wenqi LuMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chenyu LiuMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun Pan CheungMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
David S C HuiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4382-2445
Paul K S ChanCenter for Gut Microbiota Research, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-4608
Francis Ka Leung ChanMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Siew C NgMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China. siewchienng@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-4454
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of the role of the gut microbiome in acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and post-acute COVID-19 is rapidly increasing, whereas little is known regarding the contribution of multi-kingdom microbiota and host-microbial interactions to COVID-19 severity and consequences. Herein, we perform an integrated analysis using 296 fecal metagenomes, 79 fecal metabolomics, viral load in 1378 respiratory tract samples, and clinical features of 133 COVID-19 patients prospectively followed for up to 6 months. Metagenomic-based clustering identifies two robust ecological clusters (hereafter referred to as Clusters 1 and 2), of which Cluster 1 is significantly associated with severe COVID-19 and the development of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Significant differences between clusters could be explained by both multi-kingdom ecological drivers (bacteria, fungi, and viruses) and host factors with a good predictive value and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98. A model combining host and microbial factors could predict the duration of respiratory viral shedding with 82.1% accuracy (error ± 3 days). These results highlight the potential utility of host phenotype and multi-kingdom microbiota profiling as a prognostic tool for patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeFecesHumansMetagenomicsPost-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36357381
PMCPMC9648868
OpenAlexW4308885890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.