ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2023
Professional home care providers' conceptualisations of frailty in the context of home care: A focus group study.
Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Older caregivers' responsibilities and strategies for their cohabiting partners living at home-a qualitative systematic literature review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- The hospital-to-home care transition experience of home care clients: an exploratory study using patient journey mapping.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Professional home care providers' conceptualisations of frailty in the context of home care: A focus group study.International journal of older people nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Norway, as in many other countries, more people receive health and care services in their homes than before. Home care professionals provide care and support to people with a range of health and care needs. Older home care service users are sometimes referred to as 'frail', but the terms 'frail' and 'frailty' have different meanings in different contexts, and little is known about the meaning ascribed to the terms in the context of home care services. Home care services are crucial for many older persons who have health challenges, and how home care professionals conceptualise frailty might shape clinical encounters.
objectivesThe purpose of this study is to explore how home care professionals conceptualised frailty in the context of home care.
methodsWe conducted four focus group discussions with 14 home care professionals who worked in municipal home care in northern Norway and analysed the data using thematic analysis.
resultsOur analysis resulted in five themes: '"Frail" - a term which is too imprecise to be useful', 'Frailty as a consequence of ageing', 'Frailty as lack of engagement and possibilities for engagement', 'Frailty as a contextual phenomenon' and 'Frailty as potentially affected by care'. The home care professionals conceptualised frailty as an individual trait but also as resulting from the interplay between individual and environmental factors. Moreover, their conceptualisations of frailty represented a continuum between frailty as related to prevention and management ('cure') and frailty as related to ageing as natural decline ('care').
conclusionThe home care professionals conceptualised frailty diversely, as moving along a continuum between cure and care. Diverse conceptualisations of frailty might be necessary if nurses are to meet the changing and varying care needs of older persons who live in their own homes and need health and care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.