ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2022
Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy and Biopsy Status in Monitoring Therapy Response in Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infiltrative and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies: Using Imaging to Probe Mechanisms of Myocardial Dysfunction.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Review
- Article
- Observational
- Understanding the prevalence, in-hospital mortality and readmission rates amongst pulmonary vs cardiac sarcoidosis patients: insights from a nationwide registry.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Article
- Inflammation and Myocardial Blood Flow in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Clinical Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Current uses and understanding of PET imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Updated Insights on Epidemiology and Diagnostic Criteria.The American journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Cardiac sarcoidosis: phenotypes, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Review
- Persistent FDG Uptake at Apical Aneurysm in a Patient With Cardiac Sarcoidosis.JACC. Case reports · 2023Article
- Treating Myocardial Inflammation in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Why, With What, and for How Long?JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis frequently undergo fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess disease activity at baseline and after treatment initiation.
objectivesThis study investigated the effect of immunosuppressive therapy and biopsy status to achieve complete treatment response (CTR), partial treatment response (PTR), or no response (NR) on myocardial FDG-PET/CT.
methodsThis study analyzed 83 patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis (aged 53 ± 1.8 years, 71% were male, 69% were White, 61% had a history of biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis) who were treatment naive, had evidence of myocardial FDG at baseline, and underwent repeat PET imaging after treatment initiation. CTR was graded visually, and PTR/NR were measured both visually and quantitatively using the total glycolytic activity. Patients were also evaluated for the occurrence of death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure admissions.
resultsOverall, 59 patients (71%) achieved CTR/PTR (30%/41%) at follow-up scan (P = 0.04). Total glycolytic activity and visual estimate of PTR/NR had excellent agreement (κ = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.72-0.99]; P < 0.0001). In patients receiving prednisone only, the highest rates of CTR/PTR were observed in patients initiated on moderate or high dose (P < 0.01). In a regression model, moderate prednisone start dose (P = 0.03) was more strongly associated with achieving CTR/PTR than was high prednisone start dose. However, the latter patients were tapered faster between start dose and follow-up scan (P < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR: 3.1-7.8) years, patients who were biopsy-proven (vs non-biopsy-proven; P = 0.029) and with preserved left ventricular function (P = 002) were less likely to experience major adverse cardiac events. Outcomes based on treatment response status (CTR vs PTR vs NR; P = 0.23) were not significantly different.
conclusionsAmong patients with suspected sarcoidosis and evidence of myocardial inflammation, treatment response by serial FDG-PET was variable, but a favorable response was more common when using moderate-to-high intensity prednisone dose. Biopsy-proven individuals and those with preserved systolic function were less likely to experience adverse outcomes during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.