Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36357136›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2022

Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy and Biopsy Status in Monitoring Therapy Response in Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Chaitanya Rojulpote, Abhijit Bhattaru, Christopher Jean, Sarah L Adams, Vandan Patel, Mahesh K Vidula, Senthil Selvaraj, Jacob Dubroff, Eliot Peyster, Caitlin B Clancy and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Clinical Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Current uses and understanding of PET imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chaitanya RojulpoteDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abhijit BhattaruDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher JeanDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sarah L AdamsDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vandan PatelDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mahesh K VidulaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Senthil SelvarajDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jacob DubroffDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eliot PeysterDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Caitlin B ClancyDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Karen PattersonDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Francis E MarchlinskiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Milton RossmanDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lee GoldbergDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paco E BravoDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: paco.bravo@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis frequently undergo fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess disease activity at baseline and after treatment initiation.

objectivesThis study investigated the effect of immunosuppressive therapy and biopsy status to achieve complete treatment response (CTR), partial treatment response (PTR), or no response (NR) on myocardial FDG-PET/CT.

methodsThis study analyzed 83 patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis (aged 53 ± 1.8 years, 71% were male, 69% were White, 61% had a history of biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis) who were treatment naive, had evidence of myocardial FDG at baseline, and underwent repeat PET imaging after treatment initiation. CTR was graded visually, and PTR/NR were measured both visually and quantitatively using the total glycolytic activity. Patients were also evaluated for the occurrence of death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure admissions.

resultsOverall, 59 patients (71%) achieved CTR/PTR (30%/41%) at follow-up scan (P = 0.04). Total glycolytic activity and visual estimate of PTR/NR had excellent agreement (κ = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.72-0.99]; P < 0.0001). In patients receiving prednisone only, the highest rates of CTR/PTR were observed in patients initiated on moderate or high dose (P < 0.01). In a regression model, moderate prednisone start dose (P = 0.03) was more strongly associated with achieving CTR/PTR than was high prednisone start dose. However, the latter patients were tapered faster between start dose and follow-up scan (P < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR: 3.1-7.8) years, patients who were biopsy-proven (vs non-biopsy-proven; P = 0.029) and with preserved left ventricular function (P = 002) were less likely to experience major adverse cardiac events. Outcomes based on treatment response status (CTR vs PTR vs NR; P = 0.23) were not significantly different.

conclusionsAmong patients with suspected sarcoidosis and evidence of myocardial inflammation, treatment response by serial FDG-PET was variable, but a favorable response was more common when using moderate-to-high intensity prednisone dose. Biopsy-proven individuals and those with preserved systolic function were less likely to experience adverse outcomes during follow-up.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesMyocarditisSarcoidosisFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmunosuppression TherapyMalePositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsPrednisoneRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18PrednisoneRadiopharmaceuticalspositron emission tomographysarcoidosistreatment response

Identifiers

PMID36357136
OpenAlexW4292342828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.