Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36356999›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Study protocol of the BASINEL Study: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial investigating treatment versus no treatment of low-risk basal cell carcinomas in older persons.

Laura Van Coile, Evelien Verhaeghe, Katia Ongenae, Lieve Brochez, Isabelle Hoorens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110924 (A Large Pragmatic RCT Investigating Treatment Versus Non Treatment of Low-risk BCCs in Elderly), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05110924 naterminatednot on this map

A Large Pragmatic RCT Investigating Treatment Versus Non Treatment of Low-risk BCCs in Elderly

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2021 to 2024Enrolled9ConditionsBasal Cell Carcinoma, ElderlyArmsStandard of care, Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Van CoileDermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-6041
Evelien VerhaegheDermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Katia OngenaeDermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Lieve BrochezDermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Isabelle HoorensDermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium isabelle.hoorens@uzgent.be.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBasal cell carcinomas (BCCs) represent 70% of all skin cancers. These tumours do not metastasise but are locally invasive if left untreated. There is a high incidence of BCC in the elderly, and clinicians frequently face important treatment dilemmas. The approach to BCC in the elderly should be investigated thoroughly. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data on health-related quality of life (HrQoL), survival and complication rate will be examined in a treatment and a non-treatment arm (1:1 allocation). In the non-treatment arm, in vivo biological behaviour of low-risk BCCs in elderly patients will be examined. The main objective is to combine tumour characteristics with demographic data, in order to determine whether treatment will positively affect the patients' HrQoL within a predetermined time frame. A monocentric randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed at the Ghent University Hospital. The study population consists of patients with the minimum age of 75 years and a new diagnosis of (a) low-risk BCC(s). Patients in the treatment arm will receive standard care. Patients in the non-treatment arm will be closely monitored: the tumour will be intensively evaluated using multispectral dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and high-definition optical coherence tomography. All patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire concerning their HrQoL at consecutive time points. Patient-reported side effects will be evaluated via an additional questionnaire.Primary outcomes will include the difference in HrQoL and the difference in complication risks (treatment vs non-treatment) at different time points of the study. Secondary endpoints are the evolution of the BCCs in the non-treatment arm and the long-term survival in both study arms. Tertiary endpoint is the treatment effectiveness in the treatment arm. The sample size calculation was performed and resulted in a target sample size of 272 patients in this study with a 1:1 allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Subjects can withdraw from participating in this study at any time for any reason without any consequences. Approval for this study was received from the Ethics Committee of the Ghent University Hospital on 26 August 2021.The results of this RCT will be submitted for publication in one or more international, peer-reviewed medical journals, regardless of the nature of the study results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05110924).

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaCOVID-19Skin NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Treatment Outcomeadult dermatologydermatological tumoursgeriatric dermatology

Identifiers

PMID36356999
PMCPMC9660619
OpenAlexW4308882063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.