Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36356988›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2022

Treatment pattern trends of medications for type 2 diabetes in British Columbia, Canada.

Greg Carney, Jason D Kim, Cait O'Sullivan, Wade Thompson, Ken Bassett, Josh Levin, Colin R Dormuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Greg CarneyTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Gregory.Carney@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-5172
Jason D KimTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Cait O'SullivanTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Wade ThompsonTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Ken BassettTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Josh LevinTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Colin R DormuthTherapeutics Initiative, The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral new oral drug classes for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have been introduced in the last 20 years accompanied by developments in clinical evidence and guidelines. The uptake of new therapies and contemporary use of blood glucose-lowering drugs has not been closely examined in Canada. The objective of this project was to describe these treatment patterns and relate them to changes in provincial practice guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a longitudinal drug utilization study among persons with T2DM aged ≥18 years from 2001 to 2020 in British Columbia (BC), Canada. We used dispensing data from community pharmacies with linkable physician billing and hospital admission records. Laboratory results were available from 2011 onwards. We identified incident users of blood glucose-lowering drugs, then determined sequence patterns of medications dispensed, with stratification by age group, and subgroup analysis for patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.

resultsAmong a cohort of 362 391 patients (mean age 57.7 years old, 53.5% male) treated for non-insulin-dependent diabetes, the proportion who received metformin monotherapy as first-line treatment reached a maximum of 90% in 2009, decreasing to 73% in 2020. The proportion of patients starting two-drug combinations nearly doubled from 3.3% to 6.4%. Sulfonylureas were the preferred class of second-line agents over the course of the study period. In 2020, sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists accounted for 21% and 10% of second-line prescribing, respectively. For patients with baseline glycated hemoglobin (A1C) results prior to initiating diabetic treatment, 41% had a value ≤7.0% and 27% had a value over 8.5%.

conclusionsOral diabetic medication patterns have changed significantly over the last 20 years in BC, primarily in terms of medications used as second-line therapy. Over 40% of patients with available laboratory results initiated T2DM treatment with an A1C value ≤7.0%, with the average A1C value trending lower over the last decade.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseBritish ColumbiaFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentsdiabetes mellitus, type 2drug utilizationhealth services researchpractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID36356988
PMCPMC9660664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.