Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36356606›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2023

Immunological signature in human cases of monkeypox infection in 2022 outbreak: an observational study.

Chiara Agrati, Andrea Cossarizza, Valentina Mazzotta, Germana Grassi, Rita Casetti, Sara De Biasi, Carmela Pinnetti, Simona Gili, Annalisa Mondi, Flavia Cristofanelli and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A comprehensive overview of monkeypox virus disease.Tropical medicine and health · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Durability of the Humoral Response to MPXV Infection.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara AgratiLaboratory of Cellular Immunology and Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Andrea CossarizzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; National Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Bologna, Italy.
Valentina MazzottaClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy. Electronic address: valentina.mazzotta@inmi.it.
Germana GrassiLaboratory of Cellular Immunology and Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Rita CasettiLaboratory of Cellular Immunology and Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Sara De BiasiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Carmela PinnettiClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Simona GiliLaboratory of Cellular Immunology and Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Annalisa MondiClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Flavia CristofanelliLaboratory of Cellular Immunology and Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Domenico Lo TartaroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Stefania NotariLaboratory of Cellular Immunology and Pharmacology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Gaetano MaffongelliClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Roberta GagliardiniClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Lara GibelliniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Camilla AgugliaClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Simone LaniniClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Alessandra D'AbramoClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Giulia MatusaliLaboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Carla FontanaLaboratoy of Microbiology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Emanuele NicastriClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Fabrizio MaggiLaboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Enrico GirardiScientific Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Francesco VaiaGeneral Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Andrea AntinoriClinical and Research Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn unprecedented global monkeypox outbreak started in May, 2022. No data are yet available about the dynamics of the immune response against monkeypox virus. The aim of this study was to describe kinetics of T-cell response, inflammatory profile, and pox-specific T-cell induction in patients with laboratory-confirmed monkeypox.

methods17 patients with laboratory-confirmed monkeypox admitted at the Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases (Rome, Italy), from May 19, to July 7, 2022, were tested for differentiation and activation profile of CD4 and CD8 T (expression of CD38, PD-1, and CD57 assessed by flow cytometry), frequency of pox-specific T cells (by standard interferon-γ ELISpot), and release of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in plasma (by ELISA). All patients were tested 10-12 days after symptoms onset. In a subgroup of nine patients with a laboratory-confirmed monkeypox, the kinetics of the immune response were analysed longitudinally according to timing from symptoms onset and compared with ten healthy donors (ie, health-care workers recruited from the same institution).

findingsAmong the 17 patients, ten were HIV negative and seven HIV positive, all with good viro-immunological status. On days 0-3 from symptom onset, patients with laboratory-confirmed monkeypox were characterised by a statistically significant reduction in CD4+ T cells (p=0·0011) and a concurrent increase of CD8+ T cells (p=0·0057) compared with healthy donors. A lower proportion of naive (CD45RA+CD27+) CD4+ T cells was observed in six (67%) of nine patients and a concomitant higher proportion of effector memory (CD45RA-CD27-) CD4+ T cells in all patients; this skewed immune profile tended to normalise over time. A similar differentiated profile was also observed in CD8+ T cells with a consistent expansion of terminally differentiated CD8+ T cells. Patients with monkeypox had a higher proportion of CD4+CD38+ and CD38+CD8+ T-cells than healthy donors, which normalised after 12-20 days from symptom onset. The expression of PD-1 and CD57 on CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells showed kinetics similar to that observed for CD38. Furthermore, the inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF) were higher in patients with monkeypox than in healthy donors and, although they decreased over time, they remained elevated after recovery. Almost all patients (15 [94%] of 16) developed a pox-specific Th1 response. No differences in immune cells profile were observed between patients with and without HIV, whereas paucysimptomatic patients (without systemic symptoms, with less than five skin lesions, and no other mucosal localisation of monkeypox) showed a less perturbed immune profile early after symptom onset.

interpretationOur data showed the immunological signature of monkeypox virus infection, characterised by an early expansion of activated effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that persisted over time. Almost all patients, even regardless of HIV infection, developed a poxvirus-specific Th1 cell response. These results might have implications on the expected immunogenicity of monkeypox vaccination, suggesting that it might not be necessary to vaccinate people who have already been infected.

fundingItalian Ministry of Health. TRANSLATION: For the Italian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMpox, MonkeypoxCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Programmed Cell Death 1 ReceptorInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID36356606
PMCPMC9761565
OpenAlexW4308374349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.