ArticlePloS one2022
Emotion recognition while applying cosmetic cream using deep learning from EEG data; cross-subject analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurophysiological approaches to exploring emotional responses to cosmetics: a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Changes in emotional response towards different facial application gestures following skincare application: An electroencephalogram approach.International journal of cosmetic science · 2026Article
- Electroencephalography as an objective method for assessing subjective emotions during the application of cream.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
- Toward improving reproducibility in neuroimaging deep learning studies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a deep learning-based emotion recognition method using EEG data collected while applying cosmetic creams. Four creams with different textures were randomly applied, and they were divided into two classes, "like (positive)" and "dislike (negative)", according to the preference score given by the subject. We extracted frequency features using well-known frequency bands, i.e., alpha, beta and low and high gamma bands, and then we created a matrix including frequency and spatial information of the EEG data. We developed seven CNN-based models: (1) inception-like CNN with four-band merged input, (2) stacked CNN with four-band merged input, (3) stacked CNN with four-band parallel input, and stacked CNN with single-band input of (4) alpha, (5) beta, (6) low gamma, and (7) high gamma. The models were evaluated by the Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation method. In like/dislike two-class classification, the average accuracies of all subjects were 73.2%, 75.4%, 73.9%, 68.8%, 68.0%, 70.7%, and 69.7%, respectively. We found that the classification performance is higher when using multi-band features than when using single-band feature. This is the first study to apply a CNN-based deep learning method based on EEG data to evaluate preference for cosmetic creams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.