Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355893›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2022

Potential Nosocomial Infections by the Zika and Chikungunya Viruses in Public Health Facilities in the Metropolitan Area of Recife, Brazil.

Larissa Krokovsky, Duschinka Ribeiro Duarte Guedes, Fabiana Cristina Fulco Santos, Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva Sales, Daniela Anastácio Bandeira, Claudenice Ramos Pontes, Walter Soares Leal, Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres, Marcelo Henrique Santos Paiva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. One Health, One Future: A Unified Approach to a Balanced Ecosystem.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. GenusLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa KrokovskyEntomology Department, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Duschinka Ribeiro Duarte GuedesEntomology Department, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Fabiana Cristina Fulco SantosEntomology Department, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva SalesImmunology Department, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Daniela Anastácio BandeiraPernambuco's Health Department, Recife 50751-530, Brazil.
Claudenice Ramos PontesPernambuco's Health Department, Recife 50751-530, Brazil.
Walter Soares LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Constância Flávia Junqueira AyresEntomology Department, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Marcelo Henrique Santos PaivaEntomology Department, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Is Culex quinquefasciatus a vector of the Zika virus?R21AI128931 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEAL, WALTER S · 2016 to 2017
$392k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2015, the Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya viruses gained notoriety for their impact in public health in many parts of the globe, including Brazil. In Recife, the capital of Pernambuco State, the introduction of ZIKV impacted human population tremendously, owing to the increase in the number of neurological cases, such as the Guillain−Barré and congenital Zika disorders. Later, Recife was considered to be the epicenter for ZIKV epidemics in Brazil. For arboviral diseases, there are some risk factors, such as climate changes, low socioeconomic conditions, and the high densities of vectors populations, that favor the broad and rapid dispersion of these three viruses in the city. Therefore, continuous arbovirus surveillance provides an important tool for detecting these arboviruses and predicting new outbreaks. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the circulation of DENV, ZIKV, and CHIKV by RT-qPCR in mosquitoes collected in health care units from the metropolitan area of Recife (MAR), during 2018. A total of 2321 female mosquitoes (357 pools) belonging to two species, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus, were collected from 18 different healthcare units, distributed in five cities from the MAR. Twenty-three pools were positive for ZIKV, out of which, seventeen were of C. quinquefasciatus and six were of A. aegypti. Positive pools were collected in 11/18 health care units screened, with Cq values ranging from 30.0 to 37.4 and viral loads varying from 1.88 × 107 to 2.14 × 109 RNA copies/mL. Nosocomial Aedes- and Culex-borne transmission of arbovirus are widely ignored by surveillance and vector control programs, even though healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are considered a serious threat to patient safety worldwide. Although the results presented here concern only the epidemiological scenario from 2018 in MAR, the potential of hospital-acquired transmission through mosquito bites is being overlooked by public health authorities. It is, therefore, of the ultimate importance to establish specific control programs for these locations.

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptiarbovirusCulex quinquefasciatusnosocomial infectionvector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID36355893
PMCPMC9694620
OpenAlexW4308719212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.