Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355847›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Ocular-following responses in school-age children.

Aleksandar Miladinović, Christian Quaia, Miloš Ajčević, Laura Diplotti, Bruce G Cumming, Stefano Pensiero, Agostino Accardo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandar MiladinovićDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-1464
Christian QuaiaLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Miloš AjčevićDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Laura DiplottiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Bruce G CummingLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Stefano PensieroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Agostino AccardoDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular following eye movements have provided insights into how the visual system of humans and monkeys processes motion. Recently, it has been shown that they also reliably reveal stereoanomalies, and, thus, might have clinical applications. Their translation from research to clinical setting has however been hindered by their small size, which makes them difficult to record, and by a lack of data about their properties in sizable populations. Notably, they have so far only been recorded in adults. We recorded ocular following responses (OFRs)-defined as the change in eye position in the 80-160 ms time window following the motion onset of a large textured stimulus-in 14 school-age children (6 to 13 years old, 9 males and 5 females), under recording conditions that closely mimic a clinical setting. The OFRs were acquired non-invasively by a custom developed high-resolution video-oculography system, described in this study. With the developed system we were able to non-invasively detect OFRs in all children in short recording sessions. Across subjects, we observed a large variability in the magnitude of the movements (by a factor of 4); OFR magnitude was however not correlated with age. A power analysis indicates that even considerably smaller movements could be detected. We conclude that the ocular following system is well developed by age six, and OFRs can be recorded non-invasively in young children in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEye MovementsHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36355847
PMCPMC9648761
OpenAlexW4308701137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.