Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355775›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Subsequent AS01-adjuvanted vaccinations induce similar transcriptional responses in populations with different disease statuses.

Margherita Coccia, Wivine Burny, Marie-Ange Demoitié, Paul Gillard, Robert A van den Berg, Robbert van der Most

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01424501 (Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GSK Biologicals' Candidate Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01424501 phase2terminatednot on this map

Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GSK Biologicals' Candidate Tuberculosis (TB) Vaccine GSK 692342 When Administered to Adults With TB Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2011 to 2014Enrolled142ConditionsTuberculosisArmsGSK Biologicals' investigational TB vaccine GSK 692342, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. How does geographical diversity shape vaccine efficacy?Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Margherita CocciaGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-4735
Wivine BurnyGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Marie-Ange DemoitiéGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Paul GillardGSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Robert A van den BergGSK, Rockville, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-7890
Robbert van der MostGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional responses to adjuvanted vaccines can vary substantially among populations. Interindividual diversity in levels of pathogen exposure, and thus of cell-mediated immunological memory at baseline, may be an important determinant of population differences in vaccine responses. Adjuvant System AS01 is used in licensed or candidate vaccines for several diseases and populations, yet the impact of pre-existing immunity on its adjuvanticity remains to be elucidated. In this exploratory post-hoc analysis of clinical trial samples (clinicalTrials.gov: NCT01424501), we compared gene expression patterns elicited by two immunizations with the candidate tuberculosis (TB) vaccine M72/AS01, between three groups of individuals with different levels of memory responses to TB antigens before vaccination. Analyzed were one group of TB-disease-treated individuals, and two groups of TB-disease-naïve individuals who were (based on purified protein derivative [PPD] skin-test results) stratified into PPD-positive and PPD-negative groups. Although TB-disease-treated individuals displayed slightly stronger transcriptional responses after each vaccine dose, functional gene signatures were overall not distinctly different between groups. Considering the similarities with the signatures found previously for other AS01-adjuvanted vaccines, many features of the response appeared to be adjuvant-driven. Across groups, cell proliferation-related signals at 7 days post-dose 1 were associated with increased anti-M72 antibody response magnitudes. These early signals were stronger in the TB-disease-treated group as compared to both TB-disease-naïve groups. Interindividual homogeneity in gene expression levels was also higher for TB-disease-treated individuals post-dose 1, but increased in all groups post-dose 2 to attain similar levels between the three groups. Altogether, strong cell-mediated memory responses at baseline accelerated and amplified transcriptional responses to a single dose of this AS01-adjuvanted vaccine, resulting in more homogenous gene expression levels among the highly-primed individuals as compared to the disease-naïve individuals. However, after a second vaccination, response heterogeneity decreased and was similar across groups, irrespective of the degree of immune memory acquired at baseline. This information can support the design and analysis of future clinical trials evaluating AS01-adjuvanted vaccines.

Indexed as

TuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicClinical Trials as TopicHumansTuberculinVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicTuberculinTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36355775
PMCPMC9648731
OpenAlexW4308705921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.