Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355774›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2022

Global SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence from January 2020 to April 2022: A systematic review and meta-analysis of standardized population-based studies.

Isabel Bergeri, Mairead G Whelan, Harriet Ware, Lorenzo Subissi, Anthony Nardone, Hannah C Lewis, Zihan Li, Xiaomeng Ma, Marta Valenciano, Brianna Cheng and 20 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 seroassay sensitivity: a systematic review and modelling study.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  11. Inferring the true number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Japan.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Isabel BergeriWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1204-1753
Mairead G WhelanCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-9304
Harriet WareCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-3060
Lorenzo SubissiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5147-575X
Anthony NardoneWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-0937
Hannah C LewisWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1925-3943
Zihan LiCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0101-977X
Xiaomeng MaCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4165-3062
Marta ValencianoWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Brianna ChengWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2004-2251
Lubna Al AriqiWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-3343-6359
Arash RashidianWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4005-5183
Joseph OkeibunorWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Tasnim AzimWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-5871
Pushpa WijesingheWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Linh-Vi LeWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-7589
Aisling VaughanWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-2303
Richard PebodyWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrea VicariWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for the Americas (Pan American Health Organization), Washington DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5528-2517
Tingting YanTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-8710
Mercedes Yanes-LaneCOVID-19 Immunity Task Force Secretariat, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Christian CaoCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0395-0381
David A CliftonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew P ChengDivision of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4867-2063
Jesse PapenburgDivision of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4232-871X
David BuckeridgeDivision of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Niklas BobrovitzTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7883-4484
Rahul K AroraCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-6338
Maria D Van KerkhoveWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Unity Studies Collaborator Group

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur understanding of the global scale of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains incomplete: Routine surveillance data underestimate infection and cannot infer on population immunity; there is a predominance of asymptomatic infections, and uneven access to diagnostics. We meta-analyzed SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies, standardized to those described in the World Health Organization's Unity protocol (WHO Unity) for general population seroepidemiological studies, to estimate the extent of population infection and seropositivity to the virus 2 years into the pandemic. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, preprints, and grey literature for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence published between January 1, 2020 and May 20, 2022. The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020183634). We included general population cross-sectional and cohort studies meeting an assay quality threshold (90% sensitivity, 97% specificity; exceptions for humanitarian settings). We excluded studies with an unclear or closed population sample frame. Eligible studies-those aligned with the WHO Unity protocol-were extracted and critically appraised in duplicate, with risk of bias evaluated using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. We meta-analyzed seroprevalence by country and month, pooling to estimate regional and global seroprevalence over time; compared seroprevalence from infection to confirmed cases to estimate underascertainment; meta-analyzed differences in seroprevalence between demographic subgroups such as age and sex; and identified national factors associated with seroprevalence using meta-regression. We identified 513 full texts reporting 965 distinct seroprevalence studies (41% low- and middle-income countries [LMICs]) sampling 5,346,069 participants between January 2020 and April 2022, including 459 low/moderate risk of bias studies with national/subnational scope in further analysis. By September 2021, global SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence from infection or vaccination was 59.2%, 95% CI [56.1% to 62.2%]. Overall seroprevalence rose steeply in 2021 due to infection in some regions (e.g., 26.6% [24.6 to 28.8] to 86.7% [84.6% to 88.5%] in Africa in December 2021) and vaccination and infection in others (e.g., 9.6% [8.3% to 11.0%] in June 2020 to 95.9% [92.6% to 97.8%] in December 2021, in European high-income countries [HICs]). After the emergence of Omicron in March 2022, infection-induced seroprevalence rose to 47.9% [41.0% to 54.9%] in Europe HIC and 33.7% [31.6% to 36.0%] in Americas HIC. In 2021 Quarter Three (July to September), median seroprevalence to cumulative incidence ratios ranged from around 2:1 in the Americas and Europe HICs to over 100:1 in Africa (LMICs). Children 0 to 9 years and adults 60+ were at lower risk of seropositivity than adults 20 to 29 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). In a multivariable model using prevaccination data, stringent public health and social measures were associated with lower seroprevalence (p = 0.02). The main limitations of our methodology include that some estimates were driven by certain countries or populations being overrepresented.

conclusionsIn this study, we observed that global seroprevalence has risen considerably over time and with regional variation; however, over one-third of the global population are seronegative to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Our estimates of infections based on seroprevalence far exceed reported Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. Quality and standardized seroprevalence studies are essential to inform COVID-19 response, particularly in resource-limited regions.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID36355774
PMCPMC9648705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.