Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355696›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Factors associated with COVID-19 knowledge among Ghanaians: A national survey.

Mavis Pearl Kwabla, Juliana Nyasordzi, Gideon Kye-Duodu, Mark Kwame Ananga, Gregory Kofi Amenuvegbe, Joseph Otoo, Dominic Demateh Nuertey, Ebenezer Kofi Mensah, Kwadwo Asante-Afari, Dacosta Aboagye and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mavis Pearl KwablaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, F.N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-0795
Juliana NyasordziDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Allied Health Sciences. University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Gideon Kye-DuoduDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, F.N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Mark Kwame AnangaDepartment of Population and Behavioural Sciences, F.N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Gregory Kofi AmenuvegbeDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, F.N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Joseph OtooStatistics Department, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Dominic Demateh NuerteyGhana Health Service, Greater Accra Regional Health Directorate, Accra, Ghana.
Ebenezer Kofi MensahPublic Health Reference laboratory, Western and Central Region, Ghana.
Kwadwo Asante-AfariGhana Health Service, Health Promotion Division, Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.
Dacosta AboagyeGhana Health Service, Health Promotion Division, Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.
Joana AnsongThe WHO, Country office, Accra, Ghana.
Sally-Ann OheneThe WHO, Country office, Accra, Ghana.
Ghana Health Service · GHUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate knowledge about COVID-19 in a population may be relevant in the fight to control its spread among the populace. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with real knowledge of COVID-19 among Ghanaians to promote effective dissemination of appropriate information aimed at containing the spread.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey and computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) was conducted among Ghanaians aged 18 years and above across the 260 districts of Ghana. The survey assessed the level of knowledge of COVID-19 and its associated factors and compared differences between perceived and real knowledge. One district health promotion officer per district was trained for the data collection. Participants were recruited via use of phone directories of both organized and non-organized local district groups. Phone calls were made to randomly selected phone contacts to schedule options for participation in the study. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate the associated factors of COVID-19 knowledge among respondents.

resultsOf the 2,721 participants who completed the survey, the majority (99.3%) were aware of the existence of the COVID-19 outbreak, had good knowledge on infection prevention (87.0%) and rated their knowledge about COVID-19 as good (81.7%). Factors associated with COVID-19 knowledge were: age ≥56 years (aOR = 0.5; CI: 0.3-0.8; p = 0.002), tertiary education (aOR = 1.8; CI: 1.2-2.6; p = 0.003), residing in Greater Accra region (aOR = 2.0; CI: 1.1-3.6; p = 0.019), not infected with the novel coronavirus (aOR = 1.5; Cl: 1.0-2.1; p = 0.045), knowing an infected person (aOR = 3.5; CI = 1.5-7.9; p = 0.003), good practice of effective preventive measures (aOR = 1.2: Cl: 1.1-1.5: 0.008), not misinformed (aOR = 0.7; Cl: 0.5-0.9; 0.015), and perceiving spreading speed of the virus as slow (aOR = 0.7; Cl: 0.5-0.9; 0.007).

conclusionThe study found good knowledge regarding COVID-19, control measures, and preventive strategies. The Ghana Health Service should continuously provide accurate information to educate the media and citizens to prevent misinformation, which is vital in stopping the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36355696
PMCPMC9648720
OpenAlexW4308706023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.