Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355668›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2023

Social feedback promotes positive social sharing, trust, and closeness.

Emily G Brudner, Dominic S Fareri, Sandy G Shehata, Mauricio R Delgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social rejection amplifies the value of choice.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily G BrudnerDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-3807
Dominic S FareriGordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University.
Sandy G ShehataDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University.
Mauricio R DelgadoDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University.

Funding

Characterizing the neural mechanisms of social connectionR01DA053311 · NIDA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI Luke Joseph Chang, Mauricio R. Delgado · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
The role of social support and close relationships on neural and behavioral computations of valueR15MH122927 · NIMH · ADELPHI UNIVERSITY · PI FARERI, DOMINIC · 2020 to 2020
$388k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053311NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R15 MH122927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive social sharing is an interpersonal emotion regulation strategy that enhances positive affect and social belonging, particularly when met with positive social feedback. Despite the ubiquity of positive social sharing both in person and online, what drives this behavior is not well understood. We hypothesized that positive social feedback serves as a reward that reinforces sharing behavior and strengthens social bonds. Participants made trial-by-trial choices about whether to share social media photos with peers who returned positive ("likes") or negative ("dislikes") feedback. Unbeknownst to participants, peer conditions were manipulated to yield varying amounts of positive and negative feedback. Social bonding was subsequently measured using a trust game and subjective closeness ratings. Participants shared more with peers who provided greater rates of positive feedback. This effect generalized to trust decisions and subjective feelings of closeness and varied individually as a function of interpersonal emotion regulation in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

EmotionsTrustFeedbackHumansInterpersonal RelationsRewardSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID36355668
PMCPMC10169536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.