Trial reportRehabilitation psychology2022
An app-based just-in-time-adaptive self-management intervention for care partners: The CareQOL feasibility pilot study.
Trial report in Rehabilitation psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Behavior Change in Physiological Health Outcomes and the Use Case for Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Completion and Compliance Rates for an Intensive mHealth Study Design to Promote Self-Awareness and Self-Care Among Care Partners of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- Improving Outcomes for Care Partners of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Results for a mHealth Randomized Control Trial of the CareQOL App.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Preventing respiratory illness in cerebral palsy: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Qualitative Analysis of User Experiences of a mHealth Self-Care Intervention for Care Partners of Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- A comprehensive parent training program for parents of neurodivergent children with pathological demand avoidance: The Paradigm Shift ProgramPediatric investigation · 2026Article
- Use of the Roadmap positive activity app in daily life among dementia caregivers: evidence of feasibility and acceptability.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Identifying Design Opportunities for Adaptive mHealth Interventions That Target General Well-Being: Interview Study With Informal Care Partners.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of an intensive data collection protocol that involves the delivery of a personalized just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) in three distinct groups of care partners (care partners of persons with spinal cord injury [SCI], Huntington's disease [HD], or hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT]). RESEARCH METHOD/
designSeventy care partners were enrolled in this study (n = 19 SCI; n = 21 HD, n = 30 HCT). This three-month (90 day) randomized control trial involved wearing a Fitbit to track sleep and steps, providing daily reports of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and completing end of month HRQOL surveys. Care partners in the JITAI group also received personalized pushes (i.e., text-based phone notifications that include brief tips or suggestions for improving self-care). At the end of three-months, care partners in both groups completed a feasibility and acceptability questionnaire.
resultsMost (98.6%) care partners completed the study, average compliance was 88% for daily HRQOL surveys, 96% for daily steps, and 85% for daily sleep (from wearing the Fitbit), and all monthly surveys were completed with the exception of one missed 3-month assessment. The acceptability of the protocol was high; ratings exceeded 80% agreement for the different elements of the study. Improvements were seen for the majority of the HRQOL measures. There was no evidence of measurement reactivity. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings provide strong support for the acceptability and feasibility of an intensive data collection protocol that involved the administration of a JITAI. Although this trial was not powered to establish efficacy, findings indicated improvements across a variety of different HRQOL measures (~1/3 of which were statistically significant). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.