Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355462›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Improving protein structure prediction using templates and sequence embedding.

Fandi Wu, Xiaoyang Jing, Xiao Luo, Jinbo Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fandi WuInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 626011, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1615-3004
Xiaoyang JingToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7193-9101
Xiao LuoToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Jinbo XuToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

New Computational Methods for Data-driven Protein Structure PredictionR01GM089753 · NIGMS · TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE / CHICAGO · PI XU, JINBO · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research YSBR-029National Science Foundation DBI1564955NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089753NIH HHS R01GM089753NSF of China 61925208Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS and Xplore Prize
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein structure prediction has been greatly improved by deep learning, but the contribution of different information is yet to be fully understood. This article studies the impacts of two kinds of information for structure prediction: template and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) embedding. Templates have been used by some methods before, such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold and RaptorX. AlphaFold2 and RosetTTAFold only used templates detected by HHsearch, which may not perform very well on some targets. In addition, sequence embedding generated by pre-trained protein language models has not been fully explored for structure prediction. In this article, we study the impact of templates (including the number of templates, the template quality and how the templates are generated) on protein structure prediction accuracy, especially when the templates are detected by methods other than HHsearch. We also study the impact of sequence embedding (generated by MSATransformer and ESM-1b) on structure prediction.

resultsWe have implemented a deep learning method for protein structure prediction that may take templates and MSA embedding as extra inputs. We study the contribution of templates and MSA embedding to structure prediction accuracy. Our experimental results show that templates can improve structure prediction on 71 of 110 CASP13 (13th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) targets and 47 of 91 CASP14 targets, and templates are particularly useful for targets with similar templates. MSA embedding can improve structure prediction on 63 of 91 CASP14 (14th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) targets and 87 of 183 CAMEO targets and is particularly useful for proteins with shallow MSAs. When both templates and MSA embedding are used, our method can predict correct folds (TMscore > 0.5) for 16 of 23 CASP14 FM targets and 14 of 18 Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO) targets, outperforming RoseTTAFold by 5% and 7%, respectively. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Available at https://github.com/xluo233/RaptorXFold. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsProtein ConformationSequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID36355462
PMCPMC9805584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.