ArticleJMIR formative research2022
Digital Technology in Psychiatry: Survey Study of Clinicians.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Data Visualizations Into Digital Mental Health Care for Adults With Anxiety and Depression: Participatory Design and Case Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Technology-mediated screening interviews for youth mental health: Content validation, randomized controlled trial, and expert evaluation.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Comparing mental health professionals' willingness to use digital therapeutics: a cross-national survey in South Korea and Germany.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Translating digital health services for nutrition care management of chronic conditions in outpatient settings: A multi-stakeholder e-Delphi study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Article
- Digital mental health in Italy: findings from the multicentric DIGIT-PSY study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic and the worldwide online interest in telepsychiatry: an infodemiological study from 2004 to 2022.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Prioritizing clinical data for psychiatric inpatient dashboards: insights from a nationwide survey of German university centers.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Assessing Health Technology Literacy and Attitudes of Patients in an Urban Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Searching for private patient information in Internet resources (patient-targeted Google)-experiences of nurses and nursing students.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Digital Lifestyle Interventions for Young People With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study Among Mental Health Care Professionals.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Mobile health for mental health support: a survey of attitudes and concerns among mental health professionals in Poland over the period 2020-2023.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence conversational agents in mental health: Patients see potential, but prefer humans in the loop.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024Review
- Mental Health Staff's Views on Social Media Use Among People with Psychosis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital technology has the potential to transform psychiatry, but its adoption has been limited. The proliferation of telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the urgency of optimizing technology for clinical practice. Understanding clinician attitudes and preferences is crucial to effective implementation and patient benefit.
objectiveOur objective was to elicit clinician perspectives on emerging digital technology.
methodsClinicians in a large psychiatry department (inpatient and outpatient) were invited to complete a web-based survey about their attitudes toward digital technology in practice, focusing on implementation, clinical benefits, and expectations about patients' attitudes. The survey consisted of 23 questions that could be answered on either a 3-point or 5-point Likert scale. We report the frequencies and percentages of responses.
resultsIn total, 139 clinicians completed the survey-they represent a variety of years of experience, credentials, and diagnostic subspecialties (response rate 69.5%). Overall, 83.4% (n=116) of them stated that digital data could improve their practice, and 23.0% (n=32) of responders reported that they had viewed patients' profiles on social media. Among anticipated benefits, clinicians rated symptom self-tracking (n=101, 72.7%) as well as clinical intervention support (n=90, 64.7%) as most promising. Among anticipated challenges, clinicians mostly expressed concerns over greater time demand (n=123, 88.5%) and whether digital data would be actionable (n=107, 77%). Furthermore, 95.0% (n=132) of clinicians expected their patients to share digital data.
conclusionsOverall, clinicians reported a positive attitude toward the use of digital data to not only improve patient outcomes but also highlight significant barriers that implementation would need to overcome. Although clinicians' self-reported attitudes about digital technology may not necessarily translate into behavior, our results suggest that technologies that reduce clinician burden and are easily interpretable have the greatest likelihood of uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.