Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355370›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2022

Association of High Polygenic Risk With Visual Field Worsening Despite Treatment in Early Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Owen M Siggs, Ayub Qassim, Xikun Han, Henry N Marshall, Sean Mullany, Weixiong He, Emmanuelle Souzeau, Anna Galanopoulos, Ashish Agar, John Landers and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. 3D facial reconstruction refines 60-4 visual field assessment.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Owen M SiggsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Ayub QassimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Xikun HanQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Henry N MarshallDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Sean MullanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Weixiong HeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Emmanuelle SouzeauDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Anna GalanopoulosSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Ashish AgarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
John LandersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Robert J CassonSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Alex W HewittMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Paul R HealeyCentre for Vision Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Australia.
Stuart L GrahamFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.
Stuart MacGregorQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Jamie E CraigDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Flinders University · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUMacquarie University · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUWestmead Institute for Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Irreversible vision loss from primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) can be prevented through timely diagnosis and treatment, although definitive diagnosis can be difficult in early-stage disease. As a consequence, large numbers of individuals with suspected glaucoma require regular monitoring, even though many of these may never develop disease and other high-risk individuals with suspected glaucoma may have delayed or inadequate treatment. POAG is one of the most heritable common diseases, and this provides an opportunity to use genetic instruments in risk-stratified screening, diagnosis, and treatment of early glaucoma. Objective: To assess the association of glaucoma polygenic risk with glaucoma progression in early-stage disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used clinical and genetic data obtained from a longitudinal cohort study, Progression Risk of Glaucoma: Relevant SNPs With Significant Association (PROGRESSA). Participants of European ancestry with characteristic optic nerve head changes suggestive of glaucoma were included. Data were collected between February 2012 and June 2020. Analysis took place between July 2020 and April 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association of a glaucoma polygenic risk score (PRS) (2673 uncorrelated variants) with rate of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thinning on optical coherence tomography and progression of visual field loss on 24-2 Humphrey visual fields. Results: A total of 1777 eyes from 896 individuals had sufficient data for structural progression analyses and 1563 eyes from 808 individuals for functional progression analyses. The mean (SD) age was 62.1 (9.9) years, 488 (44%) were male, and 1087 of 1103 individuals (98.5%) had European ancestry. An ancestrally matched normative population cohort (n = 17 642) was used for PRS reference. Individuals in the top 5% PRS risk group were at a higher risk of visual field progression compared with the remaining 95% after 5 years (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.13-1.97; P = .005). Conversely, those in the bottom 20% PRS risk group were at a lower risk of visual field progression compared with an intermediate risk group over 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.96; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, high polygenic risk was associated with more rapid structural and functional progression in early POAG, despite more intensive treatment. A PRS may serve as a valuable adjunct to identify individuals who stand to benefit the most from more frequent surveillance and earlier or more intensive treatment.

Identifiers

PMID36355370
PMCPMC9650622
OpenAlexW4308685723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.