Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355325›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2022

Utility of CHROMagar™ Candida Plus for presumptive identification of Candida auris from surveillance samples.

Anuradha Marathe, YanChun Zhu, Vishnu Chaturvedi, Sudha Chaturvedi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Caspofungin Reshapes the Extracellular Vesicles Metabolome ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Identification of rare Candida species isolated from various clinical specimens: Comparison of different methods.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic Approaches forMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A simple and sensitive test forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  16. Evaluation of CHROMagarMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuradha MaratheMycology Laboratory, New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, USA.
YanChun ZhuMycology Laboratory, New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Vishnu ChaturvediMycology Laboratory, New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-9676
Sudha ChaturvediMycology Laboratory, New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, USA. sudha.chaturvedi@health.ny.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-8426
New York State Department of Health · US

Funding

Glycomics-driven diagnostics for Candida aurisR21AI156573 · NIAID · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CHATURVEDI, VISHNU, ZHANG, FUMING · 2021 to 2022
$454k
CDC HHS NU50CK000516NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI156573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida auris is a nosocomial fungal pathogen of prime importance due to its global emergence and rapid spread in healthcare facilities worldwide. One important concern is that routine, conventional methods fail to identify C. auris. While molecular and protein-based assays accurately detect/identify C. auris, these methods are time-consuming, expensive, and require expertise. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the potential use of a novel chromogenic medium, CHROMagar™ Candida Plus, as an economical alternative to expensive and laborious diagnostic tests. We compared CHROMagar™ Candida Plus with the standard enrichment (salt Sabouraud Dulcitol broth) medium to test the recovery efficiency of C. auris from surveillance samples. We also tested CHROMagar™ Candida Plus for its ability to distinguish C. auris from other yeast species. One hundred surveillance samples were cultured on CHROMagar™ Candida Plus and Dulcitol broth and incubated at 37 °C and 40 °C, respectively. Additionally, 32 Candida and yeast species were cultured on CHROMagar™ Candida Plus at 37 °C for three days to rule out any close resemblance to C. auris. Of 100 surveillance samples tested, 69 yielded presumptive positive C. auris exhibiting creamy pink colonies with a blue halo on CHROMagar™ Candida Plus within three days of incubation, and MALDI-TOF MS confirmed all by day 4. On the other hand, 69 of 100 surveillance samples yielded turbidity in Dulcitol broth by days 3-14 with final MALDI identification by days 5 to 17. Both media failed to identify one sample each, resulting in assay sensitivity and specificity of 99% and 97%, respectively. Of Candida and yeast species tested, 75-80% of C. metapsilosis and C. orthospilosis were misidentified as C. auris. However, previous studies indicated that these species are rarely detected in surveillance screening of C. auris. Naganishia diffluens also resembled C. auris, although it required different temperature growth (30 °C). In conclusion, CHROMagar™ Candida Plus provides rapid presumptive identification of C. auris. It would be another valuable tool in surveillance efforts to control the spread of C. auris in healthcare.

Indexed as

CandidaCandida aurisCandida parapsilosisGalactitolSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationGalactitolCandida aurisChromogenicMALDI-TOF MSSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36355325
PMCPMC9647746
OpenAlexW4308688160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.