Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355320›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2023

Detecting DNA damage in stored blood samples.

Kristina Schulze Johann, Hannah Bauer, Peter Wiegand, Heidi Pfeiffer, Marielle Vennemann

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive investigation of the Applied BiosystemsInternational journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina Schulze JohannInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany. kristina.schulzejohann@ukmuenster.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6382-2496
Hannah BauerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Peter WiegandInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Heidi PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Marielle VennemannInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University of Münster · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft VE 822/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several commercially available quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) systems enable highly sensitive detection of human DNA and provide a degradation index (DI) to assess DNA quality. From routine casework in forensic genetics, it was observed that DNA degradation in forensic samples such as blood samples stored under sub-optimal conditions leads to visible effects in multiplex analyses of short tandem repeat markers (STRs) due to decreased amplification efficiencies in longer amplicons. It was further noticed that degradation indices often remain below the value that is considered to be critical. Thus, the aim of this work was to systematically analyze this effect and to compare conventional qPCR assays with a modified qPCR approach using uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) and DNA quality assessment methods based on electrophoresis. Blood samples were stored at three different storage temperatures for up to 316 days. Significantly increased DNA recovery was observed from samples stored at high temperatures (37 °C) compared samples stored at room temperature and 4 °C. We observed typical effects of degradation in STR analyses but no correlation between DI and storage time in any of the storage conditions. Adding UNG slightly increased the sensitivity of detecting DNA degradation in one of the qPCR kits used in this study. This observation was not confirmed when using a second qPCR system. Electrophoretic systems did also not reveal significant correlations between integrity values and time. Methods for detecting DNA degradation are usually limited to the detection of DNA fragmentation, and we conclude that degradation affecting forensic STR typing is more complex.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionDNADNA FingerprintingDNA DamageDNA Degradation, NecroticHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNADegradationForensic DNA analysisQuantificationUNG

Identifiers

PMID36355320
PMCPMC10014702
OpenAlexW4308682918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read48
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.