ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2023
An Analysis of Six Month Follow-Up Data from a Peer Parent Support Study.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the Effect of Peer-Led Parenting Interventions on the Wellbeing of Parents With Children With an Emotional or Behavioural Disorder - A Systematic Review.Clinical child psychology and psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Predictors of Service Engagement and Disengagement in Community-Based Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis in Texas.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Parent and caregiver preferences for eHealth programs.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Practical and Effective Mentorship Strategies for Caregivers of Children with Chronic Conditions: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study examines trajectories of treatment outcomes 6 months after completion of a peer parent program, NAMI Basics. Fifty-two caregivers who were part of a larger trial completed questionnaires prior to, immediately after, and 6 months after completing NAMI Basics. Growth curve models were used to examine trajectories of caregiver ratings of parent activation and engagement, parent help-seeking intentions, child symptoms, outpatient service use, and parent stress at 6 months after completion of the program. Prior improvements to the outcomes of parent activation and engagement (β = 2.31, p < .001, d = 1.35), parent help-seeking intentions (β = 1.94, p = .017, d = 0.69), and child intrapersonal distress (β = - 3.93, p = 0.046, d = 0.58) were maintained at 6 months, while help-seeking intentions was not (β = 1.31, p = .222, d = 0.47). Though no changes were observed immediately post-class, caregivers reported significant increases in outpatient services use (β = - 1.51, p = .030, d = 0.68) and reductions in parenting stress (β = - 4.99, p = 0.009, d = 0.75) and overall child symptoms (β = - 19.67, p = 0.001, d = 0.90) at 6 month follow-up. These results suggest that many of the positive impacts of the NAMI Basics program are sustained 6 months after the intervention. Additionally, these results suggest that some positive outcomes of the program may not emerge until several months after taking the class. Implications and future directions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.